Literature DB >> 21811173

Anomalies of major retroperitoneal vascular structure.

Mehmet Faruk Kose1, Taner Turan, Yetkin Karasu, Burcu Gundogdu, Nurettin Boran, Gokhan Tulunay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify anomalies of major retroperitoneal vascular structure (AMRVS) during oncological retroperitoneal surgery and to investigate the effects of these anomalies in surgical procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients who underwent systematic para-aortic and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection up to the renal vein between September 2006 and December 2008 were included. Normal architecture and structural anomalies of inferior vena cava, abdominal aorta, renal arteries and veins, and common iliac artery and vein were studied.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 54.2 years. Anomalies of major retroperitoneal vascular structure were present in 39 patients (17%). Anomalies of renal vessels were identified in 31 patients. Supernumerary renal arteries and veins observed in 11 patients (17%) were the most common renal vessel anomaly. Great vessel injury was present in 19 patients (8.3%). Vascular complication rate was 20.5% in patients with AMRVS. However, in 4 of 8 patients with vascular complication and AMRVS, the complication was not related with anomalous vascular structures. None of the complications was serious and were corrected surgically. There was no difference between patients with AMRVS and those without AMRVS regarding age, body mass index, the extent of upper abdominal dissemination of malignancy and presence of comorbidity for intraoperative bleeding. There was no difference in intraoperative hemorrhage and amount of transfused red blood cell units between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Great vessel anomalies, discovered in 1 of 6 patients, were together with increased risk of vascular complications. The probability of presence of vascular anomalies should be taken into account during lymph node dissection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21811173     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182259c57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  6 in total

1.  Application of transcutaneous ultrasonography for the diagnosis of muscle mass loss in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Kazufumi Kobayashi; Hitoshi Maruyama; Soichiro Kiyono; Sadahisa Ogasawara; Eiichiro Suzuki; Yoshihiko Ooka; Tetsuhiro Chiba; Naoya Kato; Tadashi Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Is there any clinical significance of compression of left common iliac vein?

Authors:  Yoon Soon Lee
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 3.  Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecologic Oncology-Significance of Anatomical Variations.

Authors:  Stoyan Kostov; Yavor Kornovski; Stanislav Slavchev; Yonka Ivanova; Deyan Dzhenkov; Nikolay Dimitrov; Angel Yordanov
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 4.  Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecologic Oncology-Significance of Vessels Variations.

Authors:  Stoyan Kostov; Ilker Selçuk; Angel Yordanov; Yavor Kornovski; Hakan Yalçın; Stanislav Slavchev; Yonka Ivanova; Svetla Dineva; Deyan Dzhenkov; Rafał Watrowski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  A critical view of safety in left colectomy surgery: A case of renal artery injury.

Authors:  Carmelo Mazzeo; Francesca Viscosi; Giorgio Badessi; Eugenio Cucinotta
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-27

6.  A rare anomaly of left renal vein drainage into the left common iliac vein: A case report.

Authors:  Kazushige Kawai; Toshiaki Tanaka; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-01-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.