Literature DB >> 21810777

Outcomes of transoral robotic surgery: a preliminary clinical experience.

Agnes Hurtuk1, Amit Agrawal, Matthew Old, Theodoros N Teknos, Enver Ozer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report a single institution's experience with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and its clinical outcomes. STUDY
DESIGN: Preliminary clinical data from a prospective TORS study.
SETTING: University tertiary care facility. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent TORS at The Ohio State University Medical Center. Demographic, intraoperative, clinicopathological, and follow-up functional data were collected.
RESULTS: Sixty-four patients underwent TORS with a median age of 56.9 years. A total of 113 TORS procedures were performed. Fifty-four patients with squamous cell cancer (SCCA) were included in the final analysis. Mean follow-up time was 11.8 months (range, 2-29). There was a trend toward longer TORS setup time, operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospital length of stay with advanced (T(3)) compared with early-stage tumors (T(1-2)). There were no major intraoperative complications, and none of the procedures were aborted because of inability to remove the tumor. Negative resection margins were achieved in 93% of cases of SCCA. No patients experienced immediate postoperative complications, and all of the patients tolerated an oral diet without any airway compromise on the day of surgery. Forty-nine patients (91%) underwent adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), with 11 patients requiring gastrostomy tube placement during RT. Addition of TORS to overall management of head and neck SCCA spared adjuvant RT or combined chemotherapy and RT (CRT) in 50% of stage I/II tumors and spared chemotherapy in 34% of stage III/IV tumors.
CONCLUSION: TORS is a safe procedure with minimal complications and favorable clinical and functional outcomes. It is a promising future alternative surgical treatment for laryngopharyngeal tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21810777      PMCID: PMC4277657          DOI: 10.1177/0194599811402172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  21 in total

1.  The emergence of endoscopic head and neck surgery.

Authors:  Floyd Christopher Holsinger; Alexander D Sweeney; Kitti Jantharapattana; Ahmed Salem; Randal S Weber; Woong Youn Chung; Carol M Lewis; David G Grant
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Transoral robotic nasopharyngectomy: a novel approach for nasopharyngeal lesions.

Authors:  Enver Ozer; Joshua Waltonen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Correlates of health-related quality of life in upper aerodigestive tract cancer patients.

Authors:  P J Allison; D Locker; S Wood-Dauphinee; M Black; J S Feine
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms.

Authors:  Bert W O'Malley; Gregory S Weinstein; Wendy Snyder; Neil G Hockstein
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Quality of life after surgical treatment for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: a prospective longitudinal assessment of patients reconstructed by a microvascular flap.

Authors:  Pepijn A Borggreven; Neil K Aaronson; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Martin J Muller; Milou L C H Heiligers; Remco de Bree; Johannes A Langendijk; C René Leemans
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 5.337

6.  The effect of age on survival and quality of life in elderly head and neck cancer patients: a long-term prospective study.

Authors:  Marc P van der Schroeff; Wynia Derks; Gerrit Jan Hordijk; Rob J de Leeuw
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Treatment Outcomes and Quality of Life in Oropharyngeal Cancer after Surgery-based versus Radiation-based Treatment.

Authors:  Tae Wook Kim; Hye-Youn Youm; Hayoung Byun; Young-Ik Son; Chung-Hwan Baek
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.372

8.  Clinical significance of health status assessment measures in head and neck cancer: what do quality-of-life scores mean?

Authors:  Gerry F Funk; Lucy H Karnell; Russell B Smith; Alan J Christensen
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-07

9.  Clinical predictors of quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Terrell; David L Ronis; Karen E Fowler; Carol R Bradford; Douglas B Chepeha; Mark E Prince; Theodoros N Teknos; Gregory T Wolf; Sonia A Duffy
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-04

10.  Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Gregory S Weinstein; Bert W O'Malley; Wendy Snyder; Eric Sherman; Harry Quon
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-12
View more
  31 in total

1.  Transoral robotic surgery for head and neck carcinomas.

Authors:  Stéphane Hans; Cécile Badoual; Philippe Gorphe; Daniel Brasnu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Robotic surgery for oropharynx cancer: promise, challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  John R de Almeida; Eric M Genden
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Outcomes of transoral robotic surgery: a preliminary clinical experience.

Authors:  Agnes Hurtuk; Amit Agrawal; Matthew Old; Theodoros N Teknos; Enver Ozer
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Positive Margins by Oropharyngeal Subsite in Transoral Robotic Surgery for T1/T2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael J Persky; William G Albergotti; Tanya J Rath; Mark W Kubik; Shira Abberbock; Mathew Geltzeiler; Seungwon Kim; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Robert L Ferris
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Quality-of-life outcomes in transoral robotic surgery.

Authors:  Agnes M Hurtuk; Anna Marcinow; Amit Agrawal; Matthew Old; Theodoros N Teknos; Enver Ozer
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 6.  The role of transoral robotic surgery in the management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a current review.

Authors:  E Ritter Sansoni; Neil D Gross
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Nomogram for preoperative prediction of nodal extracapsular extension or positive surgical margins in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Mohammad K Hararah; William A Stokes; Bernard L Jones; Ayman Oweida; Ding Ding; Jessica McDermott; Julie Goddard; Sana D Karam
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.337

8.  Tongue base exposure during TORS without the use of a mouth prop.

Authors:  Matthew C Miller
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-06-20

9.  De-Escalated Adjuvant Therapy After Transoral Robotic Surgery for Human Papillomavirus-Related Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: The Sinai Robotic Surgery (SIRS) Trial.

Authors:  Brett A Miles; Marshall R Posner; Vishal Gupta; Marita S Teng; Richard L Bakst; Mike Yao; Kryzsztof J Misiukiewicz; Raymond L Chai; Sonam Sharma; William H Westra; Seunghee Kim-Schulze; Bheesham Dayal; Stanislaw Sobotka; Andrew G Sikora; Peter M Som; Eric M Genden
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-03-18

10.  Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal and tongue cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Thomas K Chung; Eben L Rosenthal; J Scott Magnuson; William R Carroll
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.