Literature DB >> 21809111

A systematic review of the accuracy and utility of peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer.

Pierre-Anthony Leake1, Roberta Cardoso, Rajini Seevaratnam, Laercio Lourenco, Lucy Helyer, Alyson Mahar, Corwyn Rowsell, Natalie G Coburn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is lack of uniformity in the utilization of peritoneal cytology in gastric cancer management. The identification of intraperitoneal free cancer cells (IFCCs) is believed to confer poor prognosis. However, while some of these patients are palliated, others may undergo more aggressive therapies. In this review, we aimed to identify and synthesize findings on the use of peritoneal cytology in predicting peritoneal recurrence and overall survival in curative gastric cancer patients.
METHODS: Electronic literature searches were conducted using Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2009. We determined the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of peritoneal cytology in predicting peritoneal recurrence based on four techniques-conventional cytology, immunoassay, immunohistochemistry, and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Recurrence rates and overall survival rates for curative patients were determined, based on positivity or negativity for IFCCs.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight articles were included. All four techniques showed wide variations in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in predicting peritoneal recurrence. Recurrence rates for patients positive for IFCCs ranged from 11.1 to 100%, while those negative for IFCCs had recurrence rates of 0-51%. Overall survival was significantly reduced for patients with positive IFCCs. Short follow-up periods and possible duplication of results may limit result interpretation.
CONCLUSION: The presence of IFCCs appears to increase the risk of peritoneal recurrence and is associated with worse overall survival in gastric cancer patients. Further incorporation of peritoneal cytology in clinical decision-making in gastric cancer depends on the development of a consistently accurate and rapid IFCC detection method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21809111     DOI: 10.1007/s10120-011-0071-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.370


  29 in total

1.  Long-term follow up of patients who were positive for peritoneal lavage cytology: final report from the CCOG0301 study.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kodera; Seiji Ito; Yoshinari Mochizuki; Norifumi Ohashi; Chie Tanaka; Daisuke Kobayashi; Hiroshi Kojima; Takanori Matsui; Ken Kondo; Michitaka Fujiwara
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  The effect of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage therapy (EIPL) on stage III B + C and cytology-positive gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Toshiro Masuda; Masafumi Kuramoto; Shinya Shimada; Satoshi Ikeshima; Kenichiro Yamamoto; Kenichi Nakamura; Shinich Yoshimatsu; Masayuki Urata; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Prognostic role of gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer with positive peritoneal cytology.

Authors:  Okihide Suzuki; Minoru Fukuchi; Erito Mochiki; Toru Ishiguro; Jun Sobajima; Hisashi Onozawa; Hideko Imaizumi; Youichi Kumagai; Hiroyuki Baba; Kensuke Kumamoto; Yoshitaka Tsuji; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Hideyuki Ishida
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

Review 4.  Molecular diagnosis and therapy for occult peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kagawa; Kunitoshi Shigeyasu; Michihiro Ishida; Megumi Watanabe; Hiroshi Tazawa; Takeshi Nagasaka; Yasuhiro Shirakawa; Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Prognosis and treatment of patients with positive peritoneal cytology in advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Frattini; Stefano Rausei; Corrado Chiappa; Francesca Rovera; Luigi Boni; Gianlorenzo Dionigi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-27

Review 6.  Proactive Management for Gastric, Colorectal and Appendiceal Malignancies: Preventing Peritoneal Metastases with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Authors:  Paolo Sammartino; Daniele Biacchi; Tommaso Cornali; Maurizio Cardi; Fabio Accarpio; Alessio Impagnatiello; Bianca Maria Sollazzo; Angelo Di Giorgio
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-01-26

7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of gastric cancer treatment in patients with positive peritoneal cytology.

Authors:  Carlos Suhady Cabalag; Steven Tuck Foo Chan; Yui Kaneko; Cuong Phu Duong
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 8.  Prognostic significance, diagnosis and treatment in patients with gastric cancer and positive peritoneal washings. A review of the literature.

Authors:  Radosław Lisiecki; Małgorzata Kruszwicka; Arkadiusz Spychała; Dawid Murawa
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-08-30

9.  What studies are appropriate and necessary for staging gastric adenocarcinoma? Results of an international RAND/UCLA expert panel.

Authors:  Matthew Dixon; Roberta Cardoso; Jill Tinmouth; Lucy Helyer; Calvin Law; Carol Swallow; Lawrence Paszat; Robin McLeod; Rajini Seevaratnam; Alyson Mahar; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 10.  The benefits of surgery plus extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) for patients with gastric cancer compared with surgery alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shujun Li; Laiyou Li; Bibo Tan; Jiajia Wang; Shan Xue
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.