Literature DB >> 21808971

Potentials and limitations of miniaturized calorimeters for bioprocess monitoring.

Thomas Maskow1, Torsten Schubert, Antje Wolf, Friederike Buchholz, Lars Regestein, Jochen Buechs, Florian Mertens, Hauke Harms, Johannes Lerchner.   

Abstract

In theory, heat production rates are very well suited for analysing and controlling bioprocesses on different scales from a few nanolitres up to many cubic metres. Any bioconversion is accompanied by a production (exothermic) or consumption (endothermic) of heat. The heat is tightly connected with the stoichiometry of the bioprocess via the law of Hess, and its rate is connected to the kinetics of the process. Heat signals provide real-time information of bioprocesses. The combination of heat measurements with respirometry is theoretically suited for the quantification of the coupling between catabolic and anabolic reactions. Heat measurements have also practical advantages. Unlike most other biochemical sensors, thermal transducers can be mounted in a protected way that prevents fouling, thereby minimizing response drifts. Finally, calorimetry works in optically opaque solutions and does not require labelling or reactants. It is surprising to see that despite all these advantages, calorimetry has rarely been applied to monitor and control bioprocesses with intact cells in the laboratory, industrial bioreactors or ecosystems. This review article analyses the reasons for this omission, discusses the additional information calorimetry can provide in comparison with respirometry and presents miniaturization as a potential way to overcome some inherent weaknesses of conventional calorimetry. It will be discussed for which sample types and scientific question miniaturized calorimeter can be advantageously applied. A few examples from different fields of microbiological and biotechnological research will illustrate the potentials and limitations of chip calorimetry. Finally, the future of chip calorimetry is addressed in an outlook.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21808971     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-011-3497-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  5 in total

Review 1.  Nanocalorimeters for biomolecular analysis and cell metabolism monitoring.

Authors:  Shuyu Wang; Xiaopeng Sha; Shifeng Yu; Yuliang Zhao
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Fabrication and characterization of a multichannel 3D thermopile for chip calorimeter applications.

Authors:  Tho Phuoc Huynh; Yilei Zhang; Cohen Yehuda
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Isothermal microcalorimetry accurately detects bacteria, tumorous microtissues, and parasitic worms in a label-free well-plate assay.

Authors:  Olivier Braissant; Jennifer Keiser; Isabel Meister; Alexander Bachmann; Dieter Wirz; Beat Göpfert; Gernot Bonkat; Ingemar Wadsö
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  A fast and reliable method for monitoring of prophage-activating chemicals.

Authors:  Juan Xu; Bärbel Kiesel; René Kallies; Feng-Lei Jiang; Yi Liu; Thomas Maskow
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 5.813

5.  Rapid Calorimetric Detection of Bacterial Contamination: Influence of the Cultivation Technique.

Authors:  Christian Fricke; Hauke Harms; Thomas Maskow
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.