Literature DB >> 21808534

In vitro sun protection factor determination of herbal oils used in cosmetics.

Chanchal Deep Kaur1, Swarnlata Saraf.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate ultraviolet (UV) absorption ability of volatile and nonvolatile herbal oils used in sunscreens or cosmetics and express the same in terms of sun protection factor (SPF) values. Sun protection factor is a laboratory measure of the effectiveness of sunscreen; the higher the SPF, the more protection a sunscreen offers against the ultraviolet radiations causing sunburn. The in vitro SPF is determined according to the spectrophotometric method of Mansur et al. Hydroalcoholic dilutions of oils were prepared, and in vitro photoprotective activity was studied by UV spectrophotometric method in the range of 290-320 nm. It can be observed that the SPF values found for nonvolatile oils were in between 2 and 8; and for volatile oils, in between 1 and 7. Among the fixed oils taken, SPF value of olive oil was found to be the highest. Similarly among essential oils, SPF value of peppermint oil was found to be the highest. The study will be helpful in the selection of oils and fragrances to develop sunscreens with better safety and high SPF. Oily vehicles are more effective for producing a uniform and long-lasting film of sunscreen on the skin, and their emollient properties protect the skin against the drying effects of exposure to wind and sun. Volatile oils are used as perfumes in cosmetics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erythema; herbal oils; spectrophotometric method; sun protection factor; sunscreens

Year:  2010        PMID: 21808534      PMCID: PMC3140123          DOI: 10.4103/0974-8490.60586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacognosy Res        ISSN: 0974-8490


INTRODUCTION

Solar ultra violet radiations (UVR) is divided into three categories: UV-C (200-280 nm), UV-B (280-320 nm) and UV-A (320-400 nm). UV-C is the most biologically damaging radiation, but it is filtered out by ozone layer. Currently UV-B radiation and to a lesser extent UV-A radiation are responsible for inducing skin cancer. Sunscreens and sun blocks are chemicals that absorb or block UV rays and show a variety of immunosuppressive effects of sunlight.[1] The use of skin care products supplemented with several effective agents working through different pathways in conjunction with the use of sunscreens may be an effective approach for reducing UV-B-generated ROS-mediated photo-aging.[2] Many liquid oils extracted from fruit and vegetable seeds are light, low in viscosity and less occlusive than hydrocarbon oils. Their penetrating and carrying properties, as well as their natural content of tocopherols, carotenoids and essential fatty acids, make them highly valuable. Several natural-base sunscreen lotions, including the oils of almond, avocado, coconut, cottonseed, olive, peanut, sesame and soyabean, have been reported to have UV filters. In general, when applied to skin, the vegetable oils are easily absorbed and show great spreadability. Volatile oils include odorous principles, which are found in various parts of plants, and are used as a fragrance and evaporate at room temperature. Essential oils have three distinct modes of action: Physiological (e.g., anti-inflammatory effects), psychological (e.g., aromatherapy) and cosmetic (e.g., preservative effects because of antibacterial or antioxidant properties), with corresponding benefits. Essential oils are used in the perfume industry as fragrances and in skin care products to promote hormonal balance to combat the buildup of toxins and for emolliency of skin.[3] We have selected a few herbal oils (volatile as well as nonvolatile) that are commonly used in cosmetics. The efficacy of a sunscreen is usually expressed by the sun protection factor (SPF), which is defined as the UV energy required to produce a minimal erythemal dose (MED) in protected skin, divided by the UV energy required to produce an MED in unprotected skin (equation 1): The minimal erythemal dose (MED) is defined as the lowest time interval or dosage of UV light irradiation sufficient to produce a minimal, perceptible erythema on unprotected skin.[45] The higher the SPF, the more effective is the product in preventing sunburn. The in vitro screening methods may represent a fast and reasonable tool reducing the number of in vivo experiments and risks related to UV exposure of human subjects, when the technical test parameters are adjusted and optimized.[6] The in vitro methods are in general of two types: Methods that involve the measurement of absorption or the transmission of UV radiation through sunscreen product films in quartz plates or biomembranes, and methods in which the absorption characteristics of the sunscreen agents are determined based on spectrophotometric analysis of dilute solutions.[7-11] Calculations to determine UV protection factors as defined by the COLIPA standard and other regulatory agencies involve measurement of the percent transmission of a sunscreen lotion sample across the UV spectrum weighted by the erythemal weighting factors at different wavelengths. [12] The in vitro SPFs were determined according to the method described.[91314] The observed absorbance values at 5 nm intervals (290-320 nm) were calculated by using the formula where CF = correction factor (10), EE (λ) = erythmogenic effect of radiation with wavelength λ, Abs (λ) = spectro photometric absorbance values at wavelength λ. The values of EE × I are constants. They were determined by Sayre et al.,[15] and are showed in Table 1.
Table 1

Absorbances of hydroalcoholic nonvolatile herbal oils (fixed oils)

Absorbances of hydroalcoholic nonvolatile herbal oils (fixed oils) However, there are many factors affecting the determination of SPF values, like the use of different solvents in which the sunscreens are dissolved; the combination and concentration of the sunscreens; the type of emulsion; the effects and interactions of vehicle components, such as esters, emollients and emulsifiers used in the formulation; the interaction of the vehicle with the skin; the addition of other active ingredients; the pH system and the emulsion rheological properties, among other factors, which can increase or decrease UV absorption of each sunscreen. The effect that different solvents and emollients have upon the wavelength of maximum absorbance and upon the UV absorbance of several sunscreen chemicals, alone or in combination, is well known and documented. [1617] Excipients and other active ingredients can also produce UV absorption bands, thus interfering with those of UV-A and UV-B sunscreens. This effect is reflected in a finished formulation, especially for lotions with an SPF greater than 15.[18] Vehicles used for sunscreens are hydroalcoholic lotions, water-in-oil or oil-in-water emulsions and oily lotions. The sunscreening preparation must spread on the skin, should remain in place as a continuous film, should closely adhere to the surface and should resist washing off by perspiration. When a hydroalcoholic solution is used, the water and alcohol quickly evaporate, leaving behind a self-plasticizing f ilm of sunscreen which completely covers the skin and adheres closely to it. Standard techniques for spectrophotometric evaluation of sunscreens or suntan preparations involve solution of a known weight of the screen or preparation in an ultraviolet transparent solvent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethanol (Merck®) analytical grade. Oils of various manufacturers were purchased from local pharmacies. The solubility of oils was determined in different ratios of ethanol and distilled water. It is reported that maximum of 50% of ethanol could be used in cosmetics. Hence solubility of oils was detected taking 10% to 50% of ethanol in distilled water. The maximum solubility was observed in 40% ethanol and 60% distilled water solution. Initial stock solution was prepared by taking 1% v/v of oil in ethanol and water solution (40:60). Then from this stock solution, 0.1% was prepared. Thereafter, absorbance values of each aliquot prepared were determined from 290 to 320 nm, at 5-nm intervals, taking 40% ethanol and 60% distilled water solution as blank, using Shimadzu UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu 1800, Japan); values are shown in Table 1. It was found that if we increased the concentration of oil, then turbidity increased; and on decreasing the concentration, a negative reading was obtained.

Sun protection factor determination

The aliquots prepared were scanned between 290 and 320 nm, and the obtained absorbance values were multiplied with the respective EE (λ) values. Then, their summation was taken and multiplied with the correction factor (10).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The SPF is a quantitative measurement of the effectiveness of a sunscreen formulation. To be effective in preventing sunburn and other skin damage, a sunscreen product should have a wide range of absorbance, viz., between 290 and 400 nm. The in vitro SPF is useful for screening test during product development, as a supplement of the in vivo SPF measure. In this research, volatile and nonvolatile herbal oils were evaluated by UV spectrophotometry applying Mansur mathematical equation.[9] SPF values of samples obtained using the UV spectrophotometric method are shown in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 2

Absorbances of hydroalcoholic volatile herbal oils

Absorbances of hydroalcoholic volatile herbal oils It can be observed from Table 3 that the SPF values found for nonvolatile oils were in between 2 and 8; and for volatile oils, in between 1 and 7. Out of these nonvolatile or fixed oils taken, the SPF value of olive oil and coconut oil was found to be around 8; castor oil, around 6; almond oil, around 5; mustard oil and chaulmoogra oil, around 3; and sesame oil, around 2. Hence it can be concluded that olive oil and coconut oil have the best SPF values, a finding that will be helpful in the selection of fixed oil during the formulation of sunscreens.
Table 3

Spectrophotometrically calculated sun protection factor values of herbal oils

Spectrophotometrically calculated sun protection factor values of herbal oils Similarly SPF values for volatile oils were found to be in between 1 and 7. Out of these essential oils taken, the SPF value of peppermint oil and tulsi oil was found to be around 7; lavender oil, around 6; orange oil, around 4; eucalyptus oil, around 3; tea tree oil, around 2; and rose oil, around 1. Hence it can be concluded that peppermint oil and tulsi oil have the best SPF values, a finding that will be helpful in the selection of perfumes during the formulation of sunscreens. Thus to develop sunscreens with better safety and high SPF, the formulator must understand the physicochemical principle, not only the UV absorbance of the actives but also vehicle components, such as esters, emollients, emulsifiers and fragrances used in the formulation, since sunscreens can interact with other components of the vehicle, and these interactions can affect the efficacy of sunscreens.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed UV spectrophotometric method is simple, rapid, employs low-cost reagents and can be used in the in vitro determination of SPF values in many cosmetic formulations. The proposed methodology may be useful as a rapid quality-control method. It can be used during the production process, in the analysis of the final product, and can give important information before proceeding to the in vivo tests. The knowledge of SPF values of nonvolatile oils will help in the selection of oils for the formulation of various cosmetic dosage forms as oil is the most important constituent of creams and lotions. Similarly SPF values of volatile oils will be helpful in the selection of perfumes.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Sunscreens.

Authors:  R Wolf; D Wolf; P Morganti; V Ruocco
Journal:  Clin Dermatol       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.541

Review 2.  Plants used in cosmetics.

Authors:  Talal Aburjai; Feda M Natsheh
Journal:  Phytother Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.878

3.  In vitro approaches to evaluation of Sun Protection Factor.

Authors:  H Bendová; J Akrman; A Krejcí; L Kubác; D Jírová; K Kejlová; H Kolárová; M Brabec; M Malý
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  A comparison of in vivo and in vitro testing of sunscreening formulas.

Authors:  R M Sayre; P P Agin; G J LeVee; E Marlowe
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 5.  Botanical antioxidants in the prevention of photocarcinogenesis and photoaging.

Authors:  Farrukh Afaq; Hasan Mukhtar
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.960

6.  Sunscreen in vitro spectroscopy: application to UVA protection assessment and correlation with in vivo persistent pigment darkening.

Authors:  L Ferrero; M Pissavini; S Marguerie; L Zastrow
Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.970

7.  In vitro and in vivo determinations of sun protection factors of sunscreen lotions with octylmethoxycinnamate.

Authors:  E P Santos; Z M Freitas; K R Souza; S Garcia; A Vergnanini
Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.970

  7 in total
  14 in total

1.  Sunscreen: a brief walk through history.

Authors:  Madeeha Drissi; Emily Carr; Chad Housewright
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2021-09-01

2.  Photoprotective Agents Obtained from Aromatic Plants Grown in Colombia: Total Phenolic Content, Antioxidant Activity, and Assessment of Cytotoxic Potential in Cancer Cell Lines of Cymbopogon flexuosus L. and Tagetes lucida Cav. Essential Oils.

Authors:  Karina Caballero-Gallardo; Patricia Quintero-Rincón; Elena E Stashenko; Jesus Olivero-Verbel
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27

3.  Comparative measurement of hydration effects of herbal moisturizers.

Authors:  Swarnlata Saraf; Sneha Sahu; Chanchal Deep Kaur; Shailendra Saraf
Journal:  Pharmacognosy Res       Date:  2010-05

4.  Potential use of kraft and organosolv lignins as a natural additive for healthcare products.

Authors:  Oihana Gordobil; René Herrera; Marwa Yahyaoui; Sedef İlk; Murat Kaya; Jalel Labidi
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.036

5.  Photoprotective and toxicological activities of extracts from the Antarctic moss Sanionia uncinata.

Authors:  Andréia da Silva Fernandes; Alexandre Santos Alencar; Heitor Evangelista; José Luiz Mazzei; Israel Felzenszwalb
Journal:  Pharmacogn Mag       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.085

6.  Teucrium polium L. extract adsorbed on zinc oxide nanoparticles as a fortified sunscreen.

Authors:  Mehdi Ansari; Fariba Sharififar; Maryam Kazemipour; Zarrin Sarhadinejad; Hamid Mahdavi
Journal:  Int J Pharm Investig       Date:  2013-10

7.  The Possible Pre- and Post-UVA Radiation Protective Effect of Amaranth Oil on Human Skin Fibroblast Cells.

Authors:  Katarzyna Wolosik; Ilona Zareba; Arkadiusz Surazynski; Agnieszka Markowska
Journal:  Pharmacogn Mag       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 1.085

8.  A fermented barley and soybean formula enhances skin hydration.

Authors:  Sein Lee; Jong-Eun Kim; Sujin Suk; Oh Wook Kwon; Gaeun Park; Tae-Gyu Lim; Sang Gwon Seo; Jong Rhan Kim; Dae Eung Kim; Miyeong Lee; Dae Kyun Chung; Jong Eun Jeon; Dong Woon Cho; Byung Serk Hurh; Sun Yeou Kim; Ki Won Lee
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.114

Review 9.  In vitro techniques to assess the proficiency of skin care cosmetic formulations.

Authors:  Amit Roy; Ram Kumar Sahu; Munglu Matlam; Vinay Kumar Deshmukh; Jaya Dwivedi; Arvind Kumar Jha
Journal:  Pharmacogn Rev       Date:  2013-07

10.  Microwave Hydrodiffusion and Gravity (MHG) Extraction from Different Raw Materials with Cosmetic Applications.

Authors:  Lucía López-Hortas; Elena Falqué; Herminia Domínguez; María Dolores Torres
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.