OBJECTIVE: This study described the views over time of young people referred to early intervention services (EIS), particularly as they relate to the importance of relationships. METHODS: A cohort of people aged 14 to 35 enrolled in a large multisite study of EIS for psychosis in the United Kingdom were recruited for a qualitative, longitudinal study in which they were interviewed within six months of admission to EIS and 12 months later. Transcripts of the interviews were analyzed using Charmaz's constructivist grounded-theory methodology. RESULTS: A total of 63 individuals were interviewed during the six months after their first service contact, and 36 (57%) were interviewed 12 months later. Service users generally viewed IES key workers as supportive and youth sensitive, but up to one-third felt that the three years of sustained engagement expected was too intensive. Family support was highly valued by service users, and key workers and families worked well together to support the young people as they recovered. A significant minority of service users, however, reported feeling the emergence of a new self-identity, often associated with a sense of loss of the person they had felt themselves to be before becoming ill. CONCLUSIONS: EIS for young people should provide not only the right type of engagement but also the right amount, recognize the very important role of families in giving both practical and emotional support and in liaising with key workers, and take into account the relatively rapid change in perceptions of personal identity that accompany illness.
OBJECTIVE: This study described the views over time of young people referred to early intervention services (EIS), particularly as they relate to the importance of relationships. METHODS: A cohort of people aged 14 to 35 enrolled in a large multisite study of EIS for psychosis in the United Kingdom were recruited for a qualitative, longitudinal study in which they were interviewed within six months of admission to EIS and 12 months later. Transcripts of the interviews were analyzed using Charmaz's constructivist grounded-theory methodology. RESULTS: A total of 63 individuals were interviewed during the six months after their first service contact, and 36 (57%) were interviewed 12 months later. Service users generally viewed IES key workers as supportive and youth sensitive, but up to one-third felt that the three years of sustained engagement expected was too intensive. Family support was highly valued by service users, and key workers and families worked well together to support the young people as they recovered. A significant minority of service users, however, reported feeling the emergence of a new self-identity, often associated with a sense of loss of the person they had felt themselves to be before becoming ill. CONCLUSIONS: EIS for young people should provide not only the right type of engagement but also the right amount, recognize the very important role of families in giving both practical and emotional support and in liaising with key workers, and take into account the relatively rapid change in perceptions of personal identity that accompany illness.
Authors: Helen Lester; Nagina Khan; Peter Jones; Max Marshall; David Fowler; Tim Amos; Max Birchwood Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Paolo Fusar-Poli; Andrés Estradé; Giovanni Stanghellini; Jemma Venables; Juliana Onwumere; Guilherme Messas; Lorenzo Gilardi; Barnaby Nelson; Vikram Patel; Ilaria Bonoldi; Massimiliano Aragona; Ana Cabrera; Joseba Rico; Arif Hoque; Jummy Otaiku; Nicholas Hunter; Melissa G Tamelini; Luca F Maschião; Mariana Cardoso Puchivailo; Valter L Piedade; Péter Kéri; Lily Kpodo; Charlene Sunkel; Jianan Bao; David Shiers; Elizabeth Kuipers; Celso Arango; Mario Maj Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 79.683
Authors: Richard J Drake; Merete Nordentoft; Gillian Haddock; Celso Arango; W Wolfgang Fleischhacker; Birte Glenthøj; Marion Leboyer; Stefan Leucht; Markus Leweke; Phillip McGuire; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Dan Rujescu; Iris E Sommer; René S Kahn; Shon W Lewis Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Nusrat Husain; Nadeem Gire; James Kelly; Joy Duxbury; Mick McKeown; Miv Riley; Christopher Dj Taylor; Peter J Taylor; Richard Emsley; Saeed Farooq; Neil Caton; Farooq Naeem; David Kingdon; Imran Chaudhry Journal: SAGE Open Med Date: 2016-10-18
Authors: S Jolley; H Ferner; P Bebbington; P Garety; G Dunn; D Freeman; D Fowler; E Kuipers Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 6.892
Authors: Farhana Mann; Helen L Fisher; Barnaby Major; Jo Lawrence; Andrew Tapfumaneyi; John Joyce; Mark F Hinton; Sonia Johnson Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 3.630