BACKGROUND: A number of studies have investigated the relationship between psychological factors such as stress and distress (measured as anxiety and depression) and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART). The results, however, are inconsistent, and the strength of any associations remains to be clarified. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the results of studies reporting on the associations between stress, anxiety, and depression and ART outcomes. METHODS: Prospective studies reporting data on associations between stress or distress in female patients and ART outcome were identified and evaluated by two independent researchers according to an a priori developed codebook. Authors were contacted in cases of insufficient data reporting. Stress was defined as perceived stress, work-related stress, minor life events or major life events, and distress was defined as anxiety or depression. RESULTS: A total of 31 prospective studies were included. Small, statistically significant, pooled effect sizes were found for stress [ESr, effect size correlation) = -0.08; P = 0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.15, -0.01], trait anxiety (ESr = -0.14; P = 0.02, 95% CI: -0.25, -0.03) and state anxiety (ESr = -0.10, P = 0.03, 95% CI: -0.19, -0.01), indicating negative associations with clinical pregnancy rates. A non-significant trend (Esr = -0.11, P = 0.06) was found for an association between depression and clinical pregnancy. For serum pregnancy tests and live birth rates, associations between trait anxiety or state anxiety were not significant. The fail safe number did not exceed the suggested criterion in any analyses, between-study heterogeneity was considerable and the mean age, mean duration of infertility and percentage of first time ART attenders in the study samples were found to moderate several of the associations. CONCLUSIONS: Small but significant associations were found between stress and distress and reduced pregnancy chances with ART. However, there were a limited number of studies and considerable between-study heterogeneity. Taken together, the influence of stress and distress on ART outcome may appear somewhat limited.
BACKGROUND: A number of studies have investigated the relationship between psychological factors such as stress and distress (measured as anxiety and depression) and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART). The results, however, are inconsistent, and the strength of any associations remains to be clarified. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the results of studies reporting on the associations between stress, anxiety, and depression and ART outcomes. METHODS: Prospective studies reporting data on associations between stress or distress in female patients and ART outcome were identified and evaluated by two independent researchers according to an a priori developed codebook. Authors were contacted in cases of insufficient data reporting. Stress was defined as perceived stress, work-related stress, minor life events or major life events, and distress was defined as anxiety or depression. RESULTS: A total of 31 prospective studies were included. Small, statistically significant, pooled effect sizes were found for stress [ESr, effect size correlation) = -0.08; P = 0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.15, -0.01], trait anxiety (ESr = -0.14; P = 0.02, 95% CI: -0.25, -0.03) and state anxiety (ESr = -0.10, P = 0.03, 95% CI: -0.19, -0.01), indicating negative associations with clinical pregnancy rates. A non-significant trend (Esr = -0.11, P = 0.06) was found for an association between depression and clinical pregnancy. For serum pregnancy tests and live birth rates, associations between trait anxiety or state anxiety were not significant. The fail safe number did not exceed the suggested criterion in any analyses, between-study heterogeneity was considerable and the mean age, mean duration of infertility and percentage of first time ART attenders in the study samples were found to moderate several of the associations. CONCLUSIONS: Small but significant associations were found between stress and distress and reduced pregnancy chances with ART. However, there were a limited number of studies and considerable between-study heterogeneity. Taken together, the influence of stress and distress on ART outcome may appear somewhat limited.
Authors: Maria E Bleil; Lauri A Pasch; Steven E Gregorich; Susan G Millstein; Patricia P Katz; Nancy E Adler Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2012-01-27 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Krista J Childress; Angela K Lawson; Marissa S Ghant; Gricelda Mendoza; Eden R Cardozo; Edmond Confino; Erica E Marsh Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; J C Trussell; LaTasha B Craig; Clarisa Gracia; Hao Huang; Ruben Alvero; Peter Casson; Gregory Christman; Christos Coutifaris; Michael Diamond; Susan Jin; Richard S Legro; Randal D Robinson; William D Schlaff; Heping Zhang Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Sarah R Holley; Lauri A Pasch; Maria E Bleil; Steven Gregorich; Patricia K Katz; Nancy E Adler Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Emily A Evans-Hoeker; Esther Eisenberg; Michael P Diamond; Richard S Legro; Ruben Alvero; Christos Coutifaris; Peter R Casson; Gregory M Christman; Karl R Hansen; Heping Zhang; Nanette Santoro; Anne Z Steiner Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 7.329