INTRODUCTION: Depression appears to be associated with worse survival from cancer, but underlying mechanisms for this association are unknown. In the present study, we explored the degree to which tumor genotype may be associated with depression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We examined differences in depression severity and rates of positive screens for major depressive disorder among newly diagnosed patients with stage IV NSCLC and known epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genotype. METHODS: Newly diagnosed patients (n = 53) with metastatic NSCLC attending an initial thoracic oncology consultation completed self-report questionnaires regarding demographics, smoking behavior, and depression before meeting with their oncologist. Biopsy samples were subsequently genotyped, including screening for EGFR mutations. We conducted a retrospective chart review to obtain clinical data, including tumor stage, performance status, and EGFR genotype. RESULTS: Twelve patients (22.6%) tested positive for EGFR mutation. No EGFR mutation-positive cases met the screening criteria for major depressive disorder, in comparison with 29.3% of patients with wild-type EGFR (p = .03). Mutations of EGFR were also associated with lower depression severity than with wild-type EGFR, independent of gender, performance status, and smoking history (p < .05). This finding persisted for both the cognitive-affective and somatic domains of depression symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR mutations were associated with lower depression severity and lower rates of probable major depressive disorder in patients with metastatic NSCLC, based on mood screening performed before results of genotyping were known. Findings support further work to explore the directionality of the associations and potential biological pathways to depression.
INTRODUCTION:Depression appears to be associated with worse survival from cancer, but underlying mechanisms for this association are unknown. In the present study, we explored the degree to which tumor genotype may be associated with depression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We examined differences in depression severity and rates of positive screens for major depressive disorder among newly diagnosed patients with stage IV NSCLC and known epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genotype. METHODS: Newly diagnosed patients (n = 53) with metastatic NSCLC attending an initial thoracic oncology consultation completed self-report questionnaires regarding demographics, smoking behavior, and depression before meeting with their oncologist. Biopsy samples were subsequently genotyped, including screening for EGFR mutations. We conducted a retrospective chart review to obtain clinical data, including tumor stage, performance status, and EGFR genotype. RESULTS: Twelve patients (22.6%) tested positive for EGFR mutation. No EGFR mutation-positive cases met the screening criteria for major depressive disorder, in comparison with 29.3% of patients with wild-type EGFR (p = .03). Mutations of EGFR were also associated with lower depression severity than with wild-type EGFR, independent of gender, performance status, and smoking history (p < .05). This finding persisted for both the cognitive-affective and somatic domains of depression symptoms. CONCLUSIONS:EGFR mutations were associated with lower depression severity and lower rates of probable major depressive disorder in patients with metastatic NSCLC, based on mood screening performed before results of genotyping were known. Findings support further work to explore the directionality of the associations and potential biological pathways to depression.
Authors: D L Musselman; A H Miller; M R Porter; A Manatunga; F Gao; S Penna; B D Pearce; J Landry; S Glover; J S McDaniel; C B Nemeroff Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Thomas J Lynch; Daphne W Bell; Raffaella Sordella; Sarada Gurubhagavatula; Ross A Okimoto; Brian W Brannigan; Patricia L Harris; Sara M Haserlat; Jeffrey G Supko; Frank G Haluska; David N Louis; David C Christiani; Jeff Settleman; Daniel A Haber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: L E Carlson; M Angen; J Cullum; E Goodey; J Koopmans; L Lamont; J H MacRae; M Martin; G Pelletier; J Robinson; J S A Simpson; M Speca; L Tillotson; B D Bultz Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-06-14 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Laura E MacConaill; Elizabeth Garcia; Priyanka Shivdasani; Matthew Ducar; Ravali Adusumilli; Marc Breneiser; Mark Byrne; Lawrence Chung; Jodie Conneely; Lauren Crosby; Levi A Garraway; Xin Gong; William C Hahn; Charlie Hatton; Philip W Kantoff; Michael Kluk; Frank Kuo; Yonghui Jia; Ruchi Joshi; Janina Longtine; Allison Manning; Emanuele Palescandolo; Nematullah Sharaf; Lynette Sholl; Paul van Hummelen; Jacqueline Wade; Bruce M Wollinson; Dimity Zepf; Barrett J Rollins; Neal I Lindeman Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2014-08-23 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: William F Pirl; Joseph A Greer; Lara Traeger; Vicki Jackson; Inga T Lennes; Emily R Gallagher; Pedro Perez-Cruz; Rebecca S Heist; Jennifer S Temel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-03-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Daniel C McFarland; Devika R Jutagir; Barry Rosenfeld; William Pirl; Andrew H Miller; William Breitbart; Christian Nelson Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Jonas Kuon; Miriam Blasi; Laura Unsöld; Jeannette Vogt; Anja Mehnert; Bernd Alt-Epping; Birgitt van Oorschot; Jochen Sistermanns; Miriam Ahlborn; Ulrike Ritterbusch; Susanne Stevens; Christoph Kahl; Anne Ruellan; Kathrin Matthias; Thomas Kubin; Kerstin Stahlhut; Andrea Heider; Florian Lordick; Michael Thomas Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-12-07 Impact factor: 3.359