Literature DB >> 2180774

Nonvisualized gallbladder on oral cholecystography: implications for lithotripsy.

K Wong1, O Ekberg, I Laufer, P F Malet, P Arger.   

Abstract

Currently, most protocols evaluating the efficacy of gallstone lithotripsy require a visualized gallbladder on oral cholecystography (OCG). The primary purpose of the OCG is to establish that the cystic duct is patent. When the gallbladder is visualized on OCG, it can also be used to number and size gallstones accurately. Patients with non-visualization of the gallbladder on OCG are excluded from consideration for lithotripsy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the ultrasonographic findings (i.e., number and sizes of stones in 32 patients with nonvisualization on the OCG). In 11 patients (34%) ultrasound (US) did not detect any stone, and it is presumed that the gallbladder failed to visualize for other reasons. Six patients (19%) had one or two stones and 15 (47%) patients had more than three stones. This suggests that 20% of patients with nonvisualization of the gallbladder on OCG would otherwise be eligible for lithotripsy provided that patency of the cystic duct can be demonstrated by other means, such as computed tomographic (CT) examination with oral biliary contrast or cholescintigraphy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2180774     DOI: 10.1007/BF01888754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  8 in total

1.  Further studies on the accuracy of oral cholecystography.

Authors:  H L BAKER; J R HODGSON
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1960-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Gallstone lithotripsy: a preview.

Authors:  J T Ferrucci
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The nonopacified gallbladder on oral cholecystography.

Authors:  Z Mujahed; J A Evans; J P Whalen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Cholescintigraphy, ultrasonography and computerized tomography in the evaluation of biliary tract disorders.

Authors:  H S Weissmann; M Frank; R Rosenblatt; M Goldman; L M Freeman
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 4.446

5.  The radiological diagnosis of gallbladder disease. An imaging symposium.

Authors:  R N Berk; J T Ferrucci; J S Fordtran; P L Cooperberg; H S Weissmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Computed tomography of the nonvisualizing gallbladder.

Authors:  B D Toombs; C M Sandler; P M Conoley
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Surgical and pathologic correlation of cholecystosonography and cholecystography.

Authors:  M Crade; K J Taylor; A T Rosenfield; C S de Graaff; P Minihan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Comparison of real-time cholecystosonography and oral cholecystography.

Authors:  P M Krook; F H Allen; W H Bush; G Malmer; M D MacLean
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 11.105

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.