Michael J Steiner1, Asheley Cockrell Skinner, Eliana M Perrin. 1. Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. msteiner@med.unc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are barriers to fasting lipid screening for at-risk children. Results of studies in adults have suggested that lipid testing might be reliably performed without fasting. OBJECTIVE: To examine population-level differences in pediatric lipid values based on length of fast before testing. METHODS: We used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2008) to examine total cholesterol (TC), HDL (high-density lipoprotein), LDL (low-density lipoprotein), and triglyceride cholesterol components on the basis of the period of fasting. Young children fasted for varying times before being tested, and children older than 12 years were asked to fast; however, adherence was variable. We used ordinary least-squares regression to test for differences in lipid values that were based on fasting times, controlling for weight status, age, race, ethnicity, and gender. RESULTS: TC, HDL, LDL, or triglyceride values were available for 12 744 children. Forty-eight percent of the TC and HDL samples and 80% of the LDL and triglyceride samples were collected from children who had fasted ≥ 8 hours. Fasting had a small positive effect for TC, HDL, and LDL, resulting in a mean value for the sample that was 2 to 5 mg/dL higher with a 12-hour fast compared with a no-fast sample. Fasting time had a negative effect on triglycerides (β = -0.859; P = .02), which resulted in values in the fasting group that were 7 mg/dL lower. DISCUSSION: Comparison of cholesterol screening results for a nonfasting group of children compared with results for a similar fasting group resulted in small differences that are likely not clinically important. Physicians might be able to decrease the burden of childhood cholesterol screening by not requiring prescreening fasting for these components.
BACKGROUND: There are barriers to fasting lipid screening for at-risk children. Results of studies in adults have suggested that lipid testing might be reliably performed without fasting. OBJECTIVE: To examine population-level differences in pediatric lipid values based on length of fast before testing. METHODS: We used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2008) to examine total cholesterol (TC), HDL (high-density lipoprotein), LDL (low-density lipoprotein), and triglyceridecholesterol components on the basis of the period of fasting. Young children fasted for varying times before being tested, and children older than 12 years were asked to fast; however, adherence was variable. We used ordinary least-squares regression to test for differences in lipid values that were based on fasting times, controlling for weight status, age, race, ethnicity, and gender. RESULTS:TC, HDL, LDL, or triglyceride values were available for 12 744 children. Forty-eight percent of the TC and HDL samples and 80% of the LDL and triglyceride samples were collected from children who had fasted ≥ 8 hours. Fasting had a small positive effect for TC, HDL, and LDL, resulting in a mean value for the sample that was 2 to 5 mg/dL higher with a 12-hour fast compared with a no-fast sample. Fasting time had a negative effect on triglycerides (β = -0.859; P = .02), which resulted in values in the fasting group that were 7 mg/dL lower. DISCUSSION: Comparison of cholesterol screening results for a nonfasting group of children compared with results for a similar fasting group resulted in small differences that are likely not clinically important. Physicians might be able to decrease the burden of childhood cholesterol screening by not requiring prescreening fasting for these components.
Authors: Christine L Williams; Laura L Hayman; Stephen R Daniels; Thomas N Robinson; Julia Steinberger; Stephen Paridon; Terry Bazzarre Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-07-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: H J Avis; M N Vissers; E A Stein; F A Wijburg; M D Trip; J J P Kastelein; B A Hutten Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2007-06-14 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Olli T Raitakari; Markus Juonala; Mika Kähönen; Leena Taittonen; Tomi Laitinen; Noora Mäki-Torkko; Mikko J Järvisalo; Matti Uhari; Eero Jokinen; Tapani Rönnemaa; Hans K Akerblom; Jorma S A Viikari Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-11-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: W P Newman; D S Freedman; A W Voors; P D Gard; S R Srinivasan; J L Cresanta; G D Williamson; L S Webber; G S Berenson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1986-01-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michelle L Katz; Craig R Kollman; Carly E Dougher; Mohamed Mubasher; Lori M B Laffel Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Ardashel Latsuzbaia; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Albert Hofman; Oscar H Franco; Janine F Felix Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2016-10-24 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Leonardo Trasande; Elizabeth Kajunski Fiorino; Teresa Attina; Kenneth Berger; Roberta Goldring; Claude Chemtob; Nomi Levy-Carrick; Yongzhao Shao; Mengling Liu; Elaine Urbina; Joan Reibman Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2012-12-29 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Ann M Buchanan; Suzanne P Fiorillo; Michael W Omondi; Coleen K Cunningham; John A Crump Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 2.622