Literature DB >> 21807565

Predictive value of rTMS in the identification of responders to epidural motor cortex stimulation therapy for pain.

Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur1, Isabelle Ménard-Lefaucheur, Colette Goujon, Yves Keravel, Jean-Paul Nguyen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study was designed to assess the value of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to predict the efficacy of epidural motor cortex stimulation (EMCS) to treat neuropathic pain. We have included 59 patients treated by EMCS for more than 1 year and in whom active and sham 10Hz-rTMS sessions were performed as preoperative tests, targeted over the cortical representation of the painful area. Analgesic effects were rated on a visual analogue scale. The real rTMS efficacy was determined by subtracting the effect of the sham stimulation on pain scores from that of the active stimulation (active-sham calculation). Pain scores were significantly reduced by active rTMS and EMCS, but not by sham rTMS. Twenty-six of the 33 patients (79%) who responded to active rTMS and all the 21 patients (100%) who responded for active-sham calculation also responded to EMCS. The response observed in active-sham calculation had a positive predictive value of 1.0, but a negative predictive value of .6 regarding EMCS outcome. The analgesic effect of rTMS or EMCS was not influenced by the side, origin, or duration of pain or by the presence of motor or sensory deficit in the painful area. Poorer results were observed in case of lower limb pain for rTMS and in older patients for EMCS. This study confirms that neuropathic pain can be significantly relieved by motor cortex rTMS or EMCS. A positive outcome of EMCS can be predicted by a real response to rTMS, but not on clinical grounds. PERSPECTIVE: Single sessions of sham-controlled preoperative rTMS tests can be used to confirm the indication of EMCS therapy but have no value to exclude patients from this therapy. New rTMS protocols remain to be assessed to improve the usefulness of preoperative rTMS in EMCS practice.
Copyright © 2011 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21807565     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  33 in total

Review 1.  Invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Nguyen; Julien Nizard; Yves Keravel; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Motor Cortex Stimulation for Deafferentation Pain.

Authors:  Ahmed E Hussein; Darian R Esfahani; Galina I Moisak; Jamil A Rzaev; Konstantin V Slavin
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-05-23

Review 3.  Thirty years of transcranial magnetic stimulation: where do we stand?

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  [Transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor cortex stimulation in neuropathic pain].

Authors:  V Mylius; S S Ayache; M Teepker; C Kappus; M Kolodziej; F Rosenow; C Nimsky; W H Oertel; J P Lefaucheur
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases.

Authors:  Michael D Fox; Randy L Buckner; Hesheng Liu; M Mallar Chakravarty; Andres M Lozano; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Modulating the pain network--neurostimulation for central poststroke pain.

Authors:  Koichi Hosomi; Ben Seymour; Youichi Saitoh
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 7.  Neurostimulation methods in the treatment of chronic pain.

Authors:  X Moisset; M Lanteri-Minet; D Fontaine
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 8.  Brain stimulation in the treatment of chronic neuropathic and non-cancerous pain.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Andre Machado
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 5.820

9.  At-Home Cortical Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain: a Feasibility Study with Initial Clinical Results.

Authors:  Luis Garcia-Larrea; Caroline Perchet; Koichi Hagiwara; Nathalie André-Obadia
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 10.  Invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a review.

Authors:  Raffaele Nardone; Yvonne Höller; Stefan Leis; Peter Höller; Natasha Thon; Aljoscha Thomschewski; Stefan Golaszewski; Francesco Brigo; Eugen Trinka
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.