Literature DB >> 21807560

Low oral BCG doses fail to protect cattle against an experimental challenge with Mycobacterium bovis.

Bryce M Buddle1, Frank E Aldwell, Geoffrey W de Lisle, H Martin Vordermeier, R Glyn Hewinson, D Neil Wedlock.   

Abstract

Studies were undertaken to determine whether a dose of oral Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) which did not induce skin test reactivity could protect cattle against bovine tuberculosis (TB). Groups of calves (n = 9) were vaccinated by administering 10(8), 10(7) or 10(6) colony forming units (CFU) of BCG orally or 10(6) CFU subcutaneous (s.c.) BCG. A control group (n = 10) was not vaccinated. All animals were challenged with M. bovis 18 weeks after vaccination and euthanized and necropsied at 16 weeks following challenge. Positive responses in the single cervical tuberculin skin test (severe interpretation) at 15 weeks post-vaccination were only observed in the s.c. BCG and 10(8) CFU oral BCG groups (four of nine animals/group). Following experimental challenge with M. bovis, both these BCG-vaccinated groups had significant reductions in lesion scores and bacterial counts whereas there was no protection in calves vaccinated with oral doses of 10(6) or 10(7) CFU of BCG. In conclusion, low oral doses of BCG did not induce skin test responses, IFN-γ responses or protection against TB, however, in the BCG vaccine groups where protection was observed, there was no correlation between protection and skin test responses or IFN-γ responses.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21807560     DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2011.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)        ISSN: 1472-9792            Impact factor:   3.131


  5 in total

1.  Immunogenicity of a recombinant Mycobacterium smegmatis vaccine expressing the fusion protein CMX in cattle from Goiás State, Brazil.

Authors:  Duanne Alves Da Silva; Marcos Antônio Rocha Cavalcanti; Fábio Muniz De Oliveira; Monalisa Martins Trentini; Ana Paula Junqueira-Kipnis; André Kipnis
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 1.267

Review 2.  Efficacy and Safety of BCG Vaccine for Control of Tuberculosis in Domestic Livestock and Wildlife.

Authors:  Bryce M Buddle; Hans Martin Vordermeier; Mark A Chambers; Lin-Mari de Klerk-Lorist
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-10-26

3.  Detection of live M. bovis BCG in tissues and IFN-γ responses in European badgers (Meles meles) vaccinated by oropharyngeal instillation or directly in the ileum.

Authors:  Sandrine Lesellier; Maria-Laura Boschiroli; Jacques Barrat; Christoph Wanke; Francisco J Salguero; Waldo L Garcia-Jimenez; Alex Nunez; Ana Godinho; John Spiropoulos; Simonette Palmer; Dipesh Dave; Paul Anderson; Jean-Marc Boucher; Krystel de Cruz; Sylvie Henault; Lorraine Michelet; Sonya Gowtage; Gareth A Williams; Allan K Nadian; Elodie Monchâtre-Leroy; Frank Boué; Mark A Chambers; Céline Richomme
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Vaccination with a BCG strain overexpressing Ag85B protects cattle against Mycobacterium bovis challenge.

Authors:  Caroline Rizzi; María Verónica Bianco; Federico Carlos Blanco; Marcelo Soria; María José Gravisaco; Valeria Montenegro; Lucas Vagnoni; Bryce Buddle; Sergio Garbaccio; Fernando Delgado; Karen Silva Leal; Angel Adrián Cataldi; Odir Antônio Dellagostin; Fabiana Bigi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Modelling the impact of vaccination on tuberculosis in badgers.

Authors:  J L Hardstaff; M T Bulling; G Marion; M R Hutchings; P C L White
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.434

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.