Literature DB >> 21807534

Statistical considerations for confirmatory clinical trials for similar biotherapeutic products.

Catherine Njue1.   

Abstract

For the purpose of comparing the efficacy and safety of a Similar Biotherapeutic Product (SBP) to a Reference Biotherapeutic Product (RBP), the "Guidelines on Evaluation of Similar Biotherapeutic Products (SBPs)" issued by the World Health Organisation (WHO), states that equivalence or non-inferiority studies may be acceptable. While in principle, equivalence trials are preferred, non-inferiority trials may be considered if appropriately justified, such as for a medicinal product with a wide safety margin. However, the statistical issues involved in the design, conduct, analysis and interpretation of equivalence and non-inferiority trials are complex and subtle, and require that all aspects of these trials be given careful consideration. These issues are important in order to ensure that equivalence and non-inferiority trials provide valid data that are necessary to draw reliable conclusions regarding the clinical similarity of an SBP to an RBP. Crown
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21807534     DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2011.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biologicals        ISSN: 1045-1056            Impact factor:   1.856


  8 in total

Review 1.  Biosimilars in IBD: from theory to practice.

Authors:  Silvio Danese; Stefanos Bonovas; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Biosimilars in rheumatology: what the clinician should know.

Authors:  Gilberto Castañeda-Hernández; Rodrigo González-Ramírez; Jonathan Kay; Morton A Scheinberg
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2015-05-23

Review 3.  Statistical Primer on Biosimilar Clinical Development.

Authors:  Leah Isakov; Bo Jin; Ira Allen Jacobs
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.688

4.  A phase III, randomized, two-armed, double-blind, parallel, active controlled, and non-inferiority clinical trial to compare efficacy and safety of biosimilar adalimumab (CinnoRA®) to the reference product (Humira®) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Ahmadreza Jamshidi; Farhad Gharibdoost; Mahdi Vojdanian; Soosan G Soroosh; Mohsen Soroush; Arman Ahmadzadeh; Mohammad Ali Nazarinia; Mohammad Mousavi; Hadi Karimzadeh; Mohammad Reza Shakibi; Zahra Rezaieyazdi; Maryam Sahebari; Asghar Hajiabbasi; Ali Asghar Ebrahimi; Najmeh Mahjourian; Amin Mohammadinejad Rashti
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 5.  A review of the literature analyzing benefits and concerns of infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 for the treatment of rheumatologic diseases: focus on interchangeability.

Authors:  Andrea Becciolini; Maria Gabriella Raimondo; Chiara Crotti; Elena Agape; Martina Biggioggero; Ennio Giulio Favalli
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 6.  A Comprehensive Review on Copemyl®.

Authors:  Pietro Annovazzi; Antonio Bertolotto; Vincenzo Brescia Morra; Claudio Gasperini; Enrico Montanari; Pierluigi Navarra; Francesco Patti; Maria Pia Sormani; Angelo Ghezzi
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2017-07-31

Review 7.  A critical review of the United States regulatory pathways for determining the equivalence of efficacy between CT-P13 and original infliximab (Remicade®).

Authors:  Soohyun Kim; Siun Kim; Howard Lee
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 8.  The regulatory landscape of biosimilars: WHO efforts and progress made from 2009 to 2019.

Authors:  Hye-Na Kang; Robin Thorpe; Ivana Knezevic
Journal:  Biologicals       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 1.856

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.