OBJECTIVE: To determine if outcomes after in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) using sperm from men with spinal cord injury (SCI group) differ from those of other etiologies of male factor infertility (non-SCI group). In men with SCI, to determine if IVF/ICSI outcomes differ with sperm obtained by penile vibratory stimulation (PVS group) versus electroejaculation (EEJ group). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University medical center and major infertility center. PATIENT(S): Couples with male factor infertility due to SCI versus other etiologies. INTERVENTION(S): PVS, EEJ, surgical sperm retrieval, and IVF/ICSI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Rates of fertilization, pregnancy, and live birth. RESULT(S): A total of 31 couples in the SCI group underwent 48 cycles of IVF/ICSI, and a total of 297 couples in the non-SCI group underwent 443 cycles of IVF/ICSI. The SCI group had lower fertilization rates but similar pregnancy and live birth rates compared with the non-SCI group. These rates, however, did not differ significantly when the PVS group was compared with the EEJ group. CONCLUSION(S): IVF/ICSI of sperm from men with SCI yield lower fertilization rates but similar pregnancy and live birth outcomes as IVF/ICSI of sperm from men with other etiologies of male factor infertility. Sperm collected by PVS versus EEJ in men with SCI appear to result in similar IVF/ICSI success rates.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if outcomes after in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) using sperm from men with spinal cord injury (SCI group) differ from those of other etiologies of male factor infertility (non-SCI group). In men with SCI, to determine if IVF/ICSI outcomes differ with sperm obtained by penile vibratory stimulation (PVS group) versus electroejaculation (EEJ group). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University medical center and major infertility center. PATIENT(S): Couples with male factor infertility due to SCI versus other etiologies. INTERVENTION(S): PVS, EEJ, surgical sperm retrieval, and IVF/ICSI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Rates of fertilization, pregnancy, and live birth. RESULT(S): A total of 31 couples in the SCI group underwent 48 cycles of IVF/ICSI, and a total of 297 couples in the non-SCI group underwent 443 cycles of IVF/ICSI. The SCI group had lower fertilization rates but similar pregnancy and live birth rates compared with the non-SCI group. These rates, however, did not differ significantly when the PVS group was compared with the EEJ group. CONCLUSION(S): IVF/ICSI of sperm from men with SCI yield lower fertilization rates but similar pregnancy and live birth outcomes as IVF/ICSI of sperm from men with other etiologies of male factor infertility. Sperm collected by PVS versus EEJ in men with SCI appear to result in similar IVF/ICSI success rates.
Authors: S Findeklee; M Kasoha; J C Radosa; M P Radosa; B Haj Hamoud; R M Sima Journal: Acta Endocrinol (Buchar) Date: 2021 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 0.877