Literature DB >> 21806585

Single blastocyst embryo transfer maintains comparable pregnancy rates to double cleavage-stage embryo transfer but results in healthier pregnancy outcomes.

Deirdre L Zander-Fox1, Kelton Tremellen, Michelle Lane.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal outcome after IVF is a live, healthy, singleton term baby. This can be achieved by transferring a single embryo, but at the possible expense of reducing pregnancy rates. Recent studies suggest that delaying transfer of embryos to the blastocyst stage (day 4/5), rather than the more traditional cleavage stage (day 2-3), allows for better selection of the best embryo, maximising pregnancy rates from a single embryo transfer (SET). The aim of this study was to assess pregnancy outcomes in relation to changing embryo transfer practices.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of pregnancy outcomes was made between IVF cycles conducted in 2007 when blastocyst SET became standard practice, with IVF cycles in 2003 when double cleavage-stage embryo transfer was the norm.
RESULTS: The implementation of a blastocyst SET policy resulted in a significant decrease in multiple birth rates, while maintaining live birth delivery rate comparable to double cleavage-stage transfer (27.2% versus 24.8%, respectively, N.S.).
CONCLUSION: Improvements in culturing protocols have facilitated extended culture, increasing embryo selection capability. These results indicate that it is now possible to maintain excellent pregnancy rates with SET blastocyst culture, while decreasing complications related to multiple births.
© 2011 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2011 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21806585     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01324.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  6 in total

1.  Should the flexibility enabled by performing a day-4 embryo transfer remain as a valid option in the IVF laboratory? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Simopoulou; K Sfakianoudis; P Tsioulou; A Rapani; E Maziotis; P Giannelou; S Grigoriadis; A Pantou; K Nikolettos; N Vlahos; K Pantos; M Koutsilieris
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Effect of embryo and blastocyst transfer on the birthweight of live-born singletons from FET cycles.

Authors:  Junshun Fang; Lihua Zhu; Dong Li; Zhipeng Xu; Guijun Yan; Haixiang Sun; Ningyuan Zhang; Linjun Chen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Morphokinetics of vitrified and warmed blastocysts predicts implantation potential.

Authors:  T Ebner; P Oppelt; E Radler; C Allerstorfer; A Habelsberger; R B Mayer; O Shebl
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Zhihong Yang; Jiaen Liu; Gary S Collins; Shala A Salem; Xiaohong Liu; Sarah S Lyle; Alison C Peck; E Scott Sills; Rifaat D Salem
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Array comparative genomic hybridization screening in IVF significantly reduces number of embryos available for cryopreservation.

Authors:  Jiaen Liu; E Scott Sills; Zhihong Yang; Shala A Salem; Tayyab Rahil; Gary S Collins; Xiaohong Liu; Rifaat D Salem
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2012-06-30

6.  Interleukin-6 regulates expression of Fos and Jun genes to affect the development of mouse preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Chunhua Yu; Xinyan Zhang; Li Wang; Yinan Liu; Na Li; Min Li; Li Chen; Yingyu Liu; Yuanqing Yao
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 1.730

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.