Literature DB >> 2180654

Clinical significance of ultrasonographically detected coincidental gallstones.

G Cucchiaro1, J C Rossitch, J Bowie, G D Branum, M T Niotis, C R Watters, W C Meyers.   

Abstract

The clinical profiles of 139 patients with gallstones found coincidentally during ultrasonography were reviewed and the patients followed prospectively for five years. Indications for ultrasonography included follow-up of abdominal malignancy (33%), evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm or other arteriosclerotic vascular disease (22%), renal insufficiency (12%), and lower abdominal pain (7%). At the time of gallstone detection, 14 patients (10%) had symptoms attributable to cholelithiasis. Over the next five years, only 15 patients (11%) developed episodes resembling biliary pain. Nine patients underwent cholecystectomy during this period. Three of the cholecystectomies were incidental to other abdominal procedures. Two cholecystectomies were performed as emergencies for gallstone complications with no perioperative mortality. Interestingly, 54 patients (40%) with coincidental gallstones died during the follow-up period. All the deaths were unrelated to gallstones. These data indicate that ultrasonographically detected coincidental gallstones rarely have clinical significance, leading strong support to the expectant management of most patients with purely coincidental gallstones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2180654     DOI: 10.1007/BF01536912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  18 in total

1.  Complications of cholelithiasis.

Authors:  H F Newman; J D Northup; M Rosenblum; H Abrams
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Epidemiology and natural history of gallstones.

Authors:  F Kern
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 6.115

3.  Operative management of incidental cholelithiasis.

Authors:  J S Thompson; V J Philben; P E Hodgson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Population survey: ultrasonic cholecystography.

Authors:  J C Birnholz
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1982

5.  Manifestations of gallstone disease.

Authors:  L Tucker; T N Tangedahl
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Incidental cholecystectomy during major abdominal surgery in the elderly.

Authors:  H Schreiber; W L Macon; W J Pories
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  The natural history of silent gallstones: the innocent gallstone is not a myth.

Authors:  W A Gracie; D F Ransohoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-09-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Management of cholelithiasis in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  K Ouriel; J J Ricotta; J T Adams; J A Deweese
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The natural history of cholelithiasis: the National Cooperative Gallstone Study.

Authors:  J L Thistle; P A Cleary; J M Lachin; M P Tyor; T Hersh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  The epidemiology of gallstone disease in Rome, Italy. Part II. Factors associated with the disease. The Rome Group for Epidemiology and Prevention of Cholelithiasis (GREPCO).

Authors: 
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 17.425

View more
  5 in total

1.  Gastric Bypass and Synchronous Cholecystectomy: a Matter of Numbers?

Authors:  Niccolo Petrucciani; Tarek Debs; Radwan Kassir; Imed Ben Amor; Jean Gugenheim
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Asymptomatic Gallstones (AsGS) - To Treat or Not to?

Authors:  Anu Behari; V K Kapoor
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  Natural history of gallstones in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. A prospective 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  G Del Favero; A Caroli; T Meggiato; A Volpi; P Scalon; A Puglisi; F Di Mario
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  A nationwide population-based study of common bile duct stone recurrence after endoscopic stone removal in Korea.

Authors:  Byung Kyu Park; Jeong Hun Seo; Han Ho Jeon; Jong Won Choi; Sun Young Won; Yong Suk Cho; Chun Kyon Lee; Haeyong Park; Dong Wook Kim
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 5.  Asymptomatic cholelithiasis: is cholecystectomy really needed? A critical reappraisal 15 years after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  George H Sakorafas; Dimitrios Milingos; George Peros
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.487

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.