Literature DB >> 2180611

Drug therapy in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations.

E Keller1, P Reetze, P Schollmeyer.   

Abstract

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is an accepted alternative to haemodialysis in the treatment of end-stage renal failure. The frequently used intraperitoneal administration of antibiotics to treat peritonitis and the possible role of CAPD in the elimination of drugs has stimulated pharmacokinetic research in this field. The 2 principal results derived from these studies are: (1) the elimination capacity of CAPD for drugs given systemically or orally is very low, and (2) drugs administered intraperitoneally rapidly enter the circulation, a significant amount of drug being absorbed from the peritoneal cavity. This pharmacokinetic behavior is easily understood considering some basic and simple pharmacokinetic principles: the higher the volume of distribution of a substance, the lower will be the percentage of drug present in the peritoneal cavity. Thus, a prerequisite for rapid drug elimination by CAPD is a low body volume of distribution of a particular drug. Only in such a case will the drug diffuse into the peritoneal space to a significant extent. For dosing regimens in CAPD patients, the fraction of the dose eliminated by the peritoneal route should be known or estimated. This fraction depends on the relation of the peritoneal clearance to the total body clearance, and on the protein binding of the drug. The low flow rate of the peritoneal effluent (approximately 10 L/day = 7 ml/min) appears to be the most important limiting factor for the low extraction capacity of CAPD. The list of drugs that have been found to be significantly eliminated by CAPD is short: particular mention should be made of the aminoglycosides and some cephalosporins. The data on the peritoneal elimination of vancomycin are inconsistent. Although the intravenous and oral routes have been successfully used for the treatment of peritonitis, the time course of antibiotic concentrations in the peritoneal space appears to favour the peritoneal route of drug administration. During peritonitis, intraperitoneally administered drugs enter the circulation more rapidly and completely, due to the increased permeability of the peritoneal membrane. As long as the dialysate outflow rate and protein binding of the drug are not extensively altered by peritoneal inflammation, however, the extraction capacity of CAPD appears to remain low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2180611     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199018020-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  79 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of a single intravenous dose of teicoplanin in subjects with various degrees of renal impairment.

Authors:  M Bonati; G L Traina; R Rosina; G Buniva
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Comparative study of the pharmacokinetics of various beta-lactams after intravenous and intraperitoneal administration in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  A Imada; N Itagaki; H Hasegawa; A Horiuchi
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Ketoconazole and fungal CAPD peritonitis.

Authors:  J R Chapman; D W Warnock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-08-27       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefoperazone-sulbactam in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  C A Johnson; S W Zimmerman; D P Reitberg; T J Whall; J E Leggett; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Stability of antimicrobial agents in peritoneal dialysate.

Authors:  D L Sewell; T A Golper
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Protein losses during peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  M J Blumenkrantz; G M Gahl; J D Kopple; A V Kamdar; M R Jones; M Kessel; J W Coburn
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Ranitidine pharmacokinetics in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  D A Sica; T Comstock; A Harford; F Eshelman
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Unidirectional absorption of gentamicin from the peritoneum during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  P Somani; R S Shapiro; H Stockard; J T Higgins
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Ciprofloxacin in plasma and peritoneal dialysate after oral therapy in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  L W Fleming; T A Moreland; A C Scott; W K Stewart; L O White
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Angiotensin I in peritoneal dialysis fluid improved hypotension: a case report.

Authors:  G Bönner; K Lukowski
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 0.975

View more
  9 in total

1.  Prediction of serum vancomycin concentrations following intraperitoneal loading doses in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients with peritonitis.

Authors:  G R Bailie; G Eisele; R A Venezia; D Yocum; A Hollister
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacokinetics during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  C A Taylor; E Abdel-Rahman; S W Zimmerman; C A Johnson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Drug dosage in patients during continuous renal replacement therapy. Pharmacokinetic and therapeutic considerations.

Authors:  P Reetze-Bonorden; J Böhler; E Keller
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in patients with impaired renal function.

Authors:  W L St Peter; K A Redic-Kill; C E Halstenson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Furosemide disposition in patients on CAPD.

Authors:  U Martin; R J Winney; L F Prescott
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of H2-receptor antagonists in patients with renal insufficiency.

Authors:  U Gladziwa; U Klotz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Stability of Tigecycline in Different Types of Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions.

Authors:  Robiyanto Robiyanto; Syed Tabish R Zaidi; Madhur D Shastri; Ronald L Castelino; S Troy Wanandy; Matthew D Jose; Rahul P Patel
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Oral Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor Roxadustat (FG-4592) for Treatment of Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Placebo-Controlled Study of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profiles in Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Robert Provenzano; James Tumlin; Raja Zabaneh; James Chou; Stefan Hemmerich; Thomas B Neff; K-H Peony Yu
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.126

9.  Optimising intraperitoneal gentamicin dosing in peritoneal dialysis patients with peritonitis (GIPD) study.

Authors:  Dwarakanathan Ranganathan; Julie M Varghese; Robert G Fassett; Jeffrey Lipman; Vincent D'Intini; Helen Healy; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.388

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.