Literature DB >> 21806069

Which DFT functional performs well in the calculation of methylcobalamin? Comparison of the B3LYP and BP86 functionals and evaluation of the impact of empirical dispersion correction.

Hajime Hirao1.   

Abstract

Controversy remains regarding the suitable density functionals for the calculation of vitamin B(12) systems that contain cobalt. To identify the optimum functionals, geometry optimization calculations were performed on a full-size model of methylcobalamin (MeCbl) using the B3LYP, B3LYP-D, BP86, and BP86-D methods in conjunction with the 6-31G* basis set. Single-point energy evaluations were also performed with the 6-311+G(2d,p) basis set. Consistent with previous studies, the BP86-optimized geometry showed fairly good agreement with the experimental geometry. Various factors that may influence the homolytic bond dissociation energy (BDE) of the Co-C bond of MeCbl were systematically evaluated with these methods. Our analysis demonstrated that dispersion was the largest correction term that influenced the magnitude of BDE. Previous studies have shown that B3LYP significantly underestimates BDE, whereas BP86 gives BDE values that are fairly close to the experimental values (36-37 kcal/mol). The same trend in the relative magnitudes of the BDEs was observed in the present calculations. However, BP86 underestimated the BDE for a full model of MeCbl. When the amount of Hartree-Fock exchange in the B3LYP functional was reduced to 15% and the dispersion correction was made (i.e., B3LYP*-D), the calculated BDE was in good accord with experimental values. B3P86-D also performed well. A detailed analysis was undertaken to determine which atoms in cobalamin have large dispersion interactions with a methyl fragment of MeCbl.
© 2011 American Chemical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21806069     DOI: 10.1021/jp2052807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem A        ISSN: 1089-5639            Impact factor:   2.781


  7 in total

1.  Benchmark DFT studies on C-CN homolytic cleavage and screening the substitution effect on bond dissociation energy.

Authors:  Naveen Kosar; Khurshid Ayub; Mazhar Amjad Gilani; Tariq Mahmood
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Combined spectroscopic/computational studies of vitamin B12 precursors: geometric and electronic structures of cobinamides.

Authors:  Amanda J Reig; Karen S Conrad; Thomas C Brunold
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Singlet versus Triplet Reactivity in an Mn(V)-Oxo Species: Testing Theoretical Predictions Against Experimental Evidence.

Authors:  Tzuhsiung Yang; Matthew G Quesne; Heather M Neu; Fabián G Cantú Reinhard; David P Goldberg; Sam P de Visser
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  A reaction pathway to compound 0 intermediates in oxy-myoglobin through interactions with hydrogen sulfide and His64.

Authors:  Angel D Rodriguez-Mackenzie; Hector D Arbelo-Lopez; Troy Wymore; Juan Lopez-Garriga
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.518

5.  Unsupported Donor-Acceptor Complexes of Noble Gases with Group 13 Elements.

Authors:  Lakhya J Mazumder; Amlan J Kalita; Shahnaz S Rohman; Chayanika Kashyap; Sabnam S Ullah; Indrani Baruah; Ashapurna Boro; Ankur K Guha; Pankaz K Sharma
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-03-16

6.  Benchmark Density Functional Theory Approach for the Calculation of Bond Dissociation Energies of the M-O2 Bond: A Key Step in Water Splitting Reactions.

Authors:  Naveen Kosar; Khurshid Ayub; Mazhar Amjad Gilani; Shabbir Muhammad; Tariq Mahmood
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-06-09

7.  The Binding Mode of the Sonic Hedgehog Inhibitor Robotnikinin, a Combined Docking and QM/MM MD Study.

Authors:  Manuel Hitzenberger; Daniela Schuster; Thomas S Hofer
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.221

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.