Literature DB >> 21805947

Comparing the costs of alternative models of end-of-life care.

Tom McBride1, Alec Morton, Andy Nichols, Christian van Stolk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study explores the financial consequences of decreased acute care utilization and expanded community-based care for patients at the end of life in England.
METHOD: A Markov model based on cost and utilization data was used to estimate the costs of care for cancer and organ failure in the last year of life and to simulate reduced acute care utilization.
RESULTS: We estimated at pounds 1.8 billion the cost to the taxpayer of care for the 127,000 patients dying from cancer in 2006. The equivalent cost for the 30,000 people dying from organ failure was pounds 553 million. Resources of pounds 16 to pounds 171 million could be released for cancer.
CONCLUSION: People generally prefer to die outside hospital. Our results suggest that reducing reliance on acute care could release resources and better meet peoples' preferences. Better data on the cost-effectiveness of interventions are required. Similar models would be useful to decision-makers evaluating changes in service provision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21805947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Care        ISSN: 0825-8597            Impact factor:   2.250


  7 in total

1.  End of life care for infants, children and young people (ENHANCE): Protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of current practice in the United Kingdom [version 1; peer review: 2 approved].

Authors:  Andrew Papworth; Julia Hackett; Bryony Beresford; Fliss Murtagh; Helen Weatherly; Sebastian Hinde; Andre Bedendo; Gabriella Walker; Jane Noyes; Sam Oddie; Chakrapani Vasudevan; Richard Feltbower; Bob Phillips; Richard Hain; Gayathri Subramanian; Andrew Haynes; Lorna K Fraser
Journal:  NIHR Open Res       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Bereaved family members' perceptions of the quality of end-of-life care across four types of inpatient care settings.

Authors:  Kelli Stajduhar; Richard Sawatzky; S Robin Cohen; Daren K Heyland; Diane Allan; Darcee Bidgood; Leah Norgrove; Anne M Gadermann
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 3.234

3.  Persistent inequalities in Hospice at Home provision.

Authors:  Jackie Buck; Liz Webb; Lorraine Moth; Lynn Morgan; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.568

4.  Care managers' confidence in managing home-based end-of-life care: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Maiko Watanabe; Noriko Yamamoto-Mitani; Masakazu Nishigaki; Yuko Okamoto; Ayumi Igarashi; Miho Suzuki
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Palliative radiotherapy combined with stent insertion to reduce recurrent dysphagia in oesophageal cancer patients: the ROCS RCT.

Authors:  Douglas Adamson; Jane Blazeby; Catharine Porter; Christopher Hurt; Gareth Griffiths; Annmarie Nelson; Bernadette Sewell; Mari Jones; Martina Svobodova; Deborah Fitzsimmons; Lisette Nixon; Jim Fitzgibbon; Stephen Thomas; Anthony Millin; Tom Crosby; John Staffurth; Anthony Byrne
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 6.  What cost components are relevant for economic evaluations of palliative care, and what approaches are used to measure these costs? A systematic review.

Authors:  Clare Gardiner; Christine Ingleton; Tony Ryan; Sue Ward; Merryn Gott
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.762

7.  The contributions of family care-givers at end of life: A national post-bereavement census survey of cancer carers' hours of care and expenditures.

Authors:  Christine Rowland; Barbara Hanratty; Mark Pilling; Bernard van den Berg; Gunn Grande
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.762

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.