BACKGROUND: Restenosis after endovascular treatment for superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease remains a significant clinical issue. We assessed whether cilostazol reduce restenosis after SFA stenting with self-expandable nitinol stent. METHODS: The study was a multicenter, prospective maintained database, retrospective analysis. From April 2004 to December 2009, 861 consecutive patients (mean age 71 years, 71% male) who underwent successful stenting for de novo lesions were retrospectively identified. Of them, 492 received cilostazol (cilostazol(+)) and 369 did not receive cilostazol (cilostazol(-)) after procedure. Propensity-score analyses matched 281 cilostazol(+) with 281 cilostazol (-) group. Primary endpoint was binary restenosis rate. Secondary endpoints were reocclusion, all-cause mortality and limb salvage in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Restenosis was defined as >2.4 of peak systolic velocity ratio by duplex. RESULTS: Mean follow-up period was 25 months. According to analysis of matched pairs, binary restenosis rates were significantly lower (31.2% vs. 42.9% at 5-year, P = 0.02). In-stent re-occlusion rate tended to be lower in patients who received cilostazol (10.8% vs. 18.2% at 5-year, P = 0.09) compared with control. No significant difference of all-cause mortality (21.4% vs. 18.3% at 5-year, P = 0.84) and limb salvage rate in patients with CLI (86.2% vs. 78.5% at 5-year, P = 0.29) was found between both groups. After adjustment for prespecified risk factors, cilostazol was an independent negative predictor of restenosis. In subgroup analysis, male, age <75 years, claudicant patients, TASCII C/D, small vessels and poor runoff vessel was significantly lower in binary restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Cilostazol reduced restenosis after SFA stenting with self-expandable nitinol stent and it seems to be more effective in high-risk patients for restenosis.
BACKGROUND:Restenosis after endovascular treatment for superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease remains a significant clinical issue. We assessed whether cilostazol reduce restenosis after SFA stenting with self-expandable nitinol stent. METHODS: The study was a multicenter, prospective maintained database, retrospective analysis. From April 2004 to December 2009, 861 consecutive patients (mean age 71 years, 71% male) who underwent successful stenting for de novo lesions were retrospectively identified. Of them, 492 received cilostazol (cilostazol(+)) and 369 did not receive cilostazol (cilostazol(-)) after procedure. Propensity-score analyses matched 281 cilostazol(+) with 281 cilostazol (-) group. Primary endpoint was binary restenosis rate. Secondary endpoints were reocclusion, all-cause mortality and limb salvage in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Restenosis was defined as >2.4 of peak systolic velocity ratio by duplex. RESULTS: Mean follow-up period was 25 months. According to analysis of matched pairs, binary restenosis rates were significantly lower (31.2% vs. 42.9% at 5-year, P = 0.02). In-stent re-occlusion rate tended to be lower in patients who received cilostazol (10.8% vs. 18.2% at 5-year, P = 0.09) compared with control. No significant difference of all-cause mortality (21.4% vs. 18.3% at 5-year, P = 0.84) and limb salvage rate in patients with CLI (86.2% vs. 78.5% at 5-year, P = 0.29) was found between both groups. After adjustment for prespecified risk factors, cilostazol was an independent negative predictor of restenosis. In subgroup analysis, male, age <75 years, claudicant patients, TASCII C/D, small vessels and poor runoff vessel was significantly lower in binary restenosis. CONCLUSIONS:Cilostazol reduced restenosis after SFA stenting with self-expandable nitinol stent and it seems to be more effective in high-risk patients for restenosis.
Authors: Courtney J Warner; Spencer W Greaves; Robin J Larson; David H Stone; Richard J Powell; Daniel B Walsh; Philip P Goodney Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Marco De Carlo; Giovanni Di Minno; Tobias Sayre; Mir Sohail Fazeli; Gaye Siliman; Claudio Cimminiello Journal: Curr Vasc Pharmacol Date: 2021 Impact factor: 2.719
Authors: Fernando Trés Silveira; Álvaro Razuk; Paulo Fernandes Saad; Karen Ruggeri Saad; Gustavo José Politzer Telles; Pedro Ivo C Ravizzini; Roberto Augusto Caffaro; Valter Castelli Journal: J Vasc Bras Date: 2022-09-19
Authors: Sang Ho Park; Seung Woon Rha; Cheol Ung Choi; Eung Ju Kim; Dong Joo Oh; Yun Hyeong Cho; Woong Gil Choi; Seung Jin Lee; Yong Hoon Kim; Seung Hyuk Choi; Won Ho Kim; Ki Chang Kim; Jang Hyun Cho; Joo Han Kim; Sang Min Kim; Jang Ho Bae; Jung Min Bong; Won Yu Kang; Ju Yeol Baek; Jae Bin Seo; Woo Young Chung; Mahn Won Park; Sung Ho Her; Jon Suh; Min Woong Kim; Yeo Joo Kim; Hwan Jun Choi; Jae Wan Soh Journal: Trials Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 2.279