Literature DB >> 21805619

Restenosis after stent implantation for superficial femoral artery disease in patients treated with cilostazol.

Yoshimitsu Soga1, Osamu Iida, Keisuke Hirano, Kenji Suzuki, Hiroyohi Yokoi, Masakiyo Nobuyoshi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Restenosis after endovascular treatment for superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease remains a significant clinical issue. We assessed whether cilostazol reduce restenosis after SFA stenting with self-expandable nitinol stent.
METHODS: The study was a multicenter, prospective maintained database, retrospective analysis. From April 2004 to December 2009, 861 consecutive patients (mean age 71 years, 71% male) who underwent successful stenting for de novo lesions were retrospectively identified. Of them, 492 received cilostazol (cilostazol(+)) and 369 did not receive cilostazol (cilostazol(-)) after procedure. Propensity-score analyses matched 281 cilostazol(+) with 281 cilostazol (-) group. Primary endpoint was binary restenosis rate. Secondary endpoints were reocclusion, all-cause mortality and limb salvage in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Restenosis was defined as >2.4 of peak systolic velocity ratio by duplex.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up period was 25 months. According to analysis of matched pairs, binary restenosis rates were significantly lower (31.2% vs. 42.9% at 5-year, P = 0.02). In-stent re-occlusion rate tended to be lower in patients who received cilostazol (10.8% vs. 18.2% at 5-year, P = 0.09) compared with control. No significant difference of all-cause mortality (21.4% vs. 18.3% at 5-year, P = 0.84) and limb salvage rate in patients with CLI (86.2% vs. 78.5% at 5-year, P = 0.29) was found between both groups. After adjustment for prespecified risk factors, cilostazol was an independent negative predictor of restenosis. In subgroup analysis, male, age <75 years, claudicant patients, TASCII C/D, small vessels and poor runoff vessel was significantly lower in binary restenosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Cilostazol reduced restenosis after SFA stenting with self-expandable nitinol stent and it seems to be more effective in high-risk patients for restenosis.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21805619     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  10 in total

Review 1.  Endovascular intervention for peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Arun K Thukkani; Scott Kinlay
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 2.  Clinical efficacy and safety of cilostazol: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Kelly C Rogers; Carrie S Oliphant; Shannon W Finks
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Management of Critical Limb Ischemia.

Authors:  Scott Kinlay
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.546

Review 4.  Cilostazol is associated with improved outcomes after peripheral endovascular interventions.

Authors:  Courtney J Warner; Spencer W Greaves; Robin J Larson; David H Stone; Richard J Powell; Daniel B Walsh; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Association of diabetes and hemodialysis with ankle pressure and ankle-brachial index in Japanese patients with critical limb ischemia.

Authors:  Mitsuyoshi Takahara; Hideaki Kaneto; Osamu Iida; Naoto Katakami; Taka-Aki Matsuoka; Masahiko Ikeda; Iichiro Shimomura
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 6.  Peripheral interventions and antiplatelet therapy: Role in current practice.

Authors:  Pahul Singh; Yenal Harper; Carrie S Oliphant; Mohamed Morsy; Michelle Skelton; Raza Askari; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-26

7.  Efficacy and Safety of Antiplatelet Therapies in Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marco De Carlo; Giovanni Di Minno; Tobias Sayre; Mir Sohail Fazeli; Gaye Siliman; Claudio Cimminiello
Journal:  Curr Vasc Pharmacol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.719

8.  Stent fractures in the superficial femoral artery: predisposing factors and their implications.

Authors:  Fernando Trés Silveira; Álvaro Razuk; Paulo Fernandes Saad; Karen Ruggeri Saad; Gustavo José Politzer Telles; Pedro Ivo C Ravizzini; Roberto Augusto Caffaro; Valter Castelli
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2022-09-19

9.  Literature review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of cilostazol on limb salvage rates after infrainguinal endovascular and open revascularization.

Authors:  Kshitij Desai; Britta Han; Laila Kuziez; Yan Yan; Mohamed A Zayed
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Efficacy of two different self-expanding nitinol stents for atherosclerotic femoropopliteal arterial disease (SENS-FP trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sang Ho Park; Seung Woon Rha; Cheol Ung Choi; Eung Ju Kim; Dong Joo Oh; Yun Hyeong Cho; Woong Gil Choi; Seung Jin Lee; Yong Hoon Kim; Seung Hyuk Choi; Won Ho Kim; Ki Chang Kim; Jang Hyun Cho; Joo Han Kim; Sang Min Kim; Jang Ho Bae; Jung Min Bong; Won Yu Kang; Ju Yeol Baek; Jae Bin Seo; Woo Young Chung; Mahn Won Park; Sung Ho Her; Jon Suh; Min Woong Kim; Yeo Joo Kim; Hwan Jun Choi; Jae Wan Soh
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.