Literature DB >> 21804761

Use of AERMOD to Determine a Hydrogen Sulfide Emission Factor for Swine Operations by Inverse Modeling.

Patrick T O'Shaughnessy1, Ralph Altmaier.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine both optimal settings applied to the plume dispersion model, AERMOD, and a scalable emission factor for accurately determining the spatial distribution of hydrogen sulfide concentrations in the vicinity of swine concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs). These operations emit hydrogen sulfide from both housing structures and waste lagoons. With ambient measurements made at 4 stations within 1 km of large swine CAFOs in Iowa, an inverse-modeling approach applied to AERMOD was used to determine hydrogen sulfide emission rates. CAFO buildings were treated as volume sources whereas nearby lagoons were modeled as area sources. The robust highest concentration (RHC), calculated for both measured and modeled concentrations, was used as the metric for adjusting the emission rate until the ratio of the two RHC levels was unity. Utilizing this approach, an average emission flux rate of 0.57 µg/m(2)-s was determined for swine CAFO lagoons. Using the average total animal weight (kg) of each CAFO, an average emission factor of 6.06 × 10(-7) µg/yr-m(2)-kg was calculated. From studies that measured either building or lagoon emission flux rates, building fluxes, on a floor area basis, were considered equal to lagoon flux rates. The emission factor was applied to all CAFOs surrounding the original 4 sites and surrounding an additional 6 sites in Iowa, producing an average modeled-to-measured RHC ratio of 1.24. When the emission factor was applied to AERMOD to simulate the spatial distribution of hydrogen sulfide around a hypothetical large swine CAFO (1M kg), concentrations 0.5 km from the CAFO were 35 ppb and dropped to 2 ppb within 6 km of the CAFO. These values compare to a level of 30 ppb that has been determined by the State of Iowa as a threshold level for ambient hydrogen sulfide levels.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21804761      PMCID: PMC3144569          DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)        ISSN: 1352-2310            Impact factor:   4.798


  10 in total

1.  Predicting odour impact using the Austrian odour dispersion model (AODM).

Authors:  G Schauberger; M Piringer
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.915

2.  Asthma prevalence and morbidity among rural Iowa schoolchildren.

Authors:  Elizabeth Chrischilles; Richard Ahrens; Angela Kuehl; Kevin Kelly; Peter Thorne; Leon Burmeister; James Merchant
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  School proximity to concentrated animal feeding operations and prevalence of asthma in students.

Authors:  Sigurdur T Sigurdarson; Joel N Kline
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Odor and gas release from anaerobic treatment lagoons for swine manure.

Authors:  Teng-Teeh Lim; Albert J Heber; Ji-Qin Ni; Alan L Sutton; Ping Shao
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.751

5.  Functional classification of swine manure management systems based on effluent and gas emission characteristics.

Authors:  J A Zahn; J L Hatfield; D A Laird; T T Hart; Y S Do; A A DiSpirito
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.751

6.  Quantification of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emitted from pig buildings in Korea.

Authors:  Ki Youn Kim; Han Jong Ko; Hyeon Tae Kim; Yoon Shin Kim; Young Man Roh; Cheol Min Lee; Chi Nyon Kim
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 7.  Monitoring and modeling of emissions from concentrated animal feeding operations: overview of methods.

Authors:  Bryan Bunton; Patrick O'shaughnessy; Sean Fitzsimmons; John Gering; Stephen Hoff; Merete Lyngbye; Peter S Thorne; Jeffrey Wasson; Mark Werner
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Intensive livestock operations, health, and quality of life among eastern North Carolina residents.

Authors:  S Wing; S Wolf
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Air pollution and odor in communities near industrial swine operations.

Authors:  Steve Wing; Rachel Avery Horton; Stephen W Marshall; Kendall Thu; Mansoureh Tajik; Leah Schinasi; Susan S Schiffman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Asthma and farm exposures in a cohort of rural Iowa children.

Authors:  James A Merchant; Allison L Naleway; Erik R Svendsen; Kevin M Kelly; Leon F Burmeister; Ann M Stromquist; Craig D Taylor; Peter S Thorne; Stephen J Reynolds; Wayne T Sanderson; Elizabeth A Chrischilles
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Modeling of air pollutant concentrations in an industrial region of Turkey.

Authors:  Gizem Tuna Tuygun; Hicran Altuğ; Tolga Elbir; Eftade E Gaga
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Modeling emissions from CAFO poultry farms in Poland and evaluating potential risk to surrounding populations.

Authors:  H R Pohl; M Citra; H A Abadin; I Szadkowska-Stańczyk; A Kozajda; L Ingerman; A Nguyen; H E Murray
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  Relative exposure to swine animal feeding operations and childhood asthma prevalence in an agricultural cohort.

Authors:  Brian T Pavilonis; Wayne T Sanderson; James A Merchant
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Hydrogen sulfide concentrations at three middle schools near industrial livestock facilities.

Authors:  Virginia T Guidry; Alan C Kinlaw; Jill Johnston; Devon Hall; Steve Wing
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 5.563

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.