Literature DB >> 21804179

Flip angle optimization for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI-studies with spoiled gradient echo pulse sequences.

D De Naeyer1, J Verhulst, W Ceelen, P Segers, Y De Deene, P Verdonck.   

Abstract

Spoiled gradient echo pulse (SPGRE) sequences are commonly used in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) studies to measure the contrast agent concentration in a tissue of interest over time. However, due to improper tuning of the SPGRE parameters, concentration uncertainty can be very high, even at high signal-to-noise ratio in the MR measurement. In this work, an optimization procedure is proposed for selecting the optimal value of the SPGRE-flip angle FA(opt), given the expected concentration range. The optimization condition ensures that every concentration in the assumed range has the lowest possible uncertainty. By decoupling the R(1)- and R*(2)-effects caused by the presence of the contrast agent, a contour plot has been generated from which FA(opt) can be read off for any study design. Investigation of ten recent DCE-MRI studies showed that improper flip angle selection unnecessarily increases the concentration uncertainty, up to 742% and 72% on average for the typical physiological concentration ranges of 0-2 mM in tumour tissue and 0-10 mM in blood, respectively. Simulations show that the reduced noise levels on the concentration curves, observed at the optimal flip angle, effectively increase the precision of the kinetic parameters estimates (up to 82% for K(trans), 82% for ν(e) and 92% for ν(p) in the case of an individually measured arterial input function (AIF), up to 53% for K(trans), 59% for ν(e) and 67% for ν(p) in the case of a standard AIF). In vivo experiments confirm the potential of flip angle optimization to increase the reproducibility of the kinetic parameter estimates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21804179     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/16/019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of DCE-MRI parameters for brain tumors through implementation of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model approaches for Gd-DOTA.

Authors:  Marios Spanakis; Eleftherios Kontopodis; Sophie Van Cauter; Vangelis Sakkalis; Kostas Marias
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Quantitative evaluation of dual-flip-angle T1 mapping on DCE-MRI kinetic parameter estimation in head and neck.

Authors:  Jing Yuan; Steven Kwok Keung Chow; David Ka Wai Yeung; Anil T Ahuja; Ann D King
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2012-12

3.  Breast dynamic contrast-enhanced examinations with fat suppression: are contrast-agent uptake curves affected by magnetic field inhomogeneity?

Authors:  Maria A Schmidt; M Borri; E Scurr; G Ertas; G Payne; E O'Flynn; N Desouza; M O Leach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Self-Gated Late Gadolinium Enhancement at 7T to Image Rats with Reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Yushu Chen; Bing Zhang; Wei Chen; Chunhua Wang; Li Song; Ziqian Xu; Jie Zheng; Fabao Gao
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  An experimental phantom study of the effect of gadolinium-based MR contrast agents on PET attenuation coefficients and PET quantification in PET-MR imaging: application to cardiac studies.

Authors:  Jim O' Doherty; Paul Schleyer
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2017-01-13

6.  Improved repeatability of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using the complex MRI signal to derive arterial input functions: a test-retest study in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Edzo M E Klawer; Petra J van Houdt; Frank F J Simonis; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Floris J Pos; Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Sofie Isebaert; Karin Haustermans; Uulke A van der Heide
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Phantom Validation of DCE-MRI Magnitude and Phase-Based Vascular Input Function Measurements.

Authors:  Warren Foltz; Brandon Driscoll; Sangjune Laurence Lee; Krishna Nayak; Naren Nallapareddy; Ali Fatemi; Cynthia Ménard; Catherine Coolens; Caroline Chung
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2019-03

8.  Quantifying MRI T1 relaxation in flowing blood: implications for arterial input function measurement in DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Matthew N Gwilliam; David J Collins; Martin O Leach; Matthew R Orton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Eye-specific quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI analysis for patients with intraocular masses.

Authors:  Myriam G Jaarsma-Coes; Teresa A Ferreira; Petra J van Houdt; Uulke A van der Heide; Gregorius P M Luyten; Jan-Willem M Beenakker
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Quality assurance in MRI breast screening: comparing signal-to-noise ratio in dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging protocols.

Authors:  Evanthia Kousi; Marco Borri; Jamie Dean; Rafal Panek; Erica Scurr; Martin O Leach; Maria A Schmidt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.609

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.