OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect on mortality of the left atrial volume index (LAVI) and left ventricular (LV) geometry (normal, concentric remodeling, eccentric hypertrophy, and concentric hypertrophy). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2006, we evaluated 36,561 patients with preserved ejection fraction with an average follow-up of 1.7±1.0 years. The LAVI was categorized as normal (≤28 mL/m(2)) or increased (mild, 29-33 mL/m(2); moderate, 34-39 mL/m(2); severe, ≥40 mL/m(2)). RESULTS: Progressive increases in LAVI and mortality were noted with abnormal LV geometry. Similarly, abnormal LV geometry and mortality were significantly higher in patients with increased LAVI. In patients who died vs surviving patients, the LAVI ± SD was significantly higher (33.0±14.8 vs 28.1±10.8 mL/m(2); P<.001) and abnormal LV geometry was significantly more prevalent (62% vs 44%; P<.001). Compared with those with a normal LAVI, patients with a severe LAVI had a 42% increased risk of mortality. In patients with normal LV geometry or concentric remodeling, a severe LAVI was a significant independent predictor of mortality, with an increased risk of 28% and 46%, respectively. Similarly, in patients with eccentric hypertrophy and concentric hypertrophy, the mortality risk in patients with a severe LAVI was twice that of patients with a normal LAVI. Comparison of area under the curve (0.565 [without LAVI] vs 0.596 [with LAVI]; P<.001] and predictive models with and without LAVI for mortality prediction were significant, indicating increased mortality prediction by the addition of LAVI to other independent predictors. CONCLUSION: The LAVI significantly predicts mortality risk, independent of LV geometry, and adds to the overall mortality prediction in a large cohort of patients with preserved systolic function.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect on mortality of the left atrial volume index (LAVI) and left ventricular (LV) geometry (normal, concentric remodeling, eccentric hypertrophy, and concentric hypertrophy). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2006, we evaluated 36,561 patients with preserved ejection fraction with an average follow-up of 1.7±1.0 years. The LAVI was categorized as normal (≤28 mL/m(2)) or increased (mild, 29-33 mL/m(2); moderate, 34-39 mL/m(2); severe, ≥40 mL/m(2)). RESULTS: Progressive increases in LAVI and mortality were noted with abnormal LV geometry. Similarly, abnormal LV geometry and mortality were significantly higher in patients with increased LAVI. In patients who died vs surviving patients, the LAVI ± SD was significantly higher (33.0±14.8 vs 28.1±10.8 mL/m(2); P<.001) and abnormal LV geometry was significantly more prevalent (62% vs 44%; P<.001). Compared with those with a normal LAVI, patients with a severe LAVI had a 42% increased risk of mortality. In patients with normal LV geometry or concentric remodeling, a severe LAVI was a significant independent predictor of mortality, with an increased risk of 28% and 46%, respectively. Similarly, in patients with eccentric hypertrophy and concentric hypertrophy, the mortality risk in patients with a severe LAVI was twice that of patients with a normal LAVI. Comparison of area under the curve (0.565 [without LAVI] vs 0.596 [with LAVI]; P<.001] and predictive models with and without LAVI for mortality prediction were significant, indicating increased mortality prediction by the addition of LAVI to other independent predictors. CONCLUSION: The LAVI significantly predicts mortality risk, independent of LV geometry, and adds to the overall mortality prediction in a large cohort of patients with preserved systolic function.
Authors: T S Tsang; M E Barnes; K R Bailey; C L Leibson; S C Montgomery; Y Takemoto; P M Diamond; M A Marra; B J Gersh; D O Wiebers; G W Petty; J B Seward Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Jacob E Moller; Graham S Hillis; Jae K Oh; James B Seward; Guy S Reeder; R Scott Wright; Seung W Park; Kent R Bailey; Patricia A Pellikka Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-04-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Surya M Artham; Carl J Lavie; Richard V Milani; Dharmendrakumar A Patel; Anil Verma; Hector O Ventura Journal: Prog Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2009 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 8.194
Authors: J M Gardin; R McClelland; D Kitzman; J A Lima; W Bommer; H S Klopfenstein; N D Wong; V E Smith; J Gottdiener Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2001-05-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Carl J Lavie; Richard V Milani; Hector O Ventura; Gustavo A Cardenas; Mandeep R Mehra; Franz H Messerli Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2007-08-27 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Giovanni de Simone; Raffaele Izzo; Marcello Chinali; Marina De Marco; Giuseppina Casalnuovo; Francesco Rozza; Daniela Girfoglio; Gianni Luigi Iovino; Bruno Trimarco; Nicola De Luca Journal: Hypertension Date: 2010-05-24 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: James H O'Keefe; Harshal R Patil; Carl J Lavie; Anthony Magalski; Robert A Vogel; Peter A McCullough Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Koki Nakanishi; Zhezhen Jin; Shunichi Homma; Mitchell S V Elkind; Tatjana Rundek; Aylin Tugcu; Mitsuhiro Yoshita; Charles DeCarli; Clinton B Wright; Ralph L Sacco; Marco R Di Tullio Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: İbrahim Yıldız; Pinar Özmen Yildiz; Cengiz Burak; İbrahim Rencüzoğulları; Guner Karaveli Gursoy; Bulent Kaya; Yavuz Karabağ; Metin Çağdaş Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 1.927
Authors: Moritz Proplesch; Allison A Merz; Brian L Claggett; Eldrin F Lewis; Kristin H Dwyer; Daniela R Crousillat; Emily S Lau; Montane B Silverman; Julie Peck; Jose Rivero; Susan Cheng; Elke Platz Journal: Echocardiography Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 1.724
Authors: Marijana Tadic; Cesare Cuspidi; Irena Ilic; Jelena Suzic-Lazić; Vladimir Zivanovic; Ljilja Jozika; Vera Celic Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-12-12 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Alexandra Gonçalves; Chung-Lieh Hung; Brian Claggett; Kotaro Nochioka; Susan Cheng; Dalane W Kitzman; Amil M Shah; Scott D Solomon Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 7.792