Literature DB >> 21803660

Comparative early outcomes of three laparoscopic bariatric procedures: sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch.

Philippe Topart1, Guillaume Becouarn, Patrick Ritz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of the isolated sleeve gastrectomy in 1997, this procedure has gained immense popularity in the hopes of reducing the operative risks with a less complex operation. We reviewed our recent 2-year experience with bariatric surgery to compare the early outcomes of the 3 complex procedures routinely performed by our private practice at a single institution: sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS).
METHODS: The 30-day morbidity and 90-day mortality rates were retrospectively reviewed among a total of 507 primary bariatric procedures. The early postoperative outcomes of 360 RYGB, 88 SG, and 59 BPD-DS procedures performed during this period were compared.
RESULTS: The patients weighed more in the BPD-DS and SG groups. The SG patients were significantly older than the RYGB and BPD-DS patients. Co-morbidities were significantly more frequent in the SG and BPD-DS patients. One patient died after RYGB but none did so after BPD-DS or SG. The global complication rate was significantly increased after BPD-DS (P = .0017) compared with RYGB; however, no difference was found between RYGB and SG, although bleeding was likely to appear more frequent, not only after BPD-DS, but also after SG compared with RYGB.
CONCLUSION: Although no fatal outcomes occurred after SG, this procedure did not demonstrate a reduced risk of postoperative complications compared with RYGB with a significantly greater rate of bleeding. RYGB appears to be a relatively safe bariatric procedure, although the groups were not comparable in terms of the preoperative body mass index or co-morbidities, the exact role of which on postoperative morbidity remains controversial. Although the increased risk of RYGB to BPD-DS was confirmed, SG failed to live up to its "more benign" reputation.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21803660     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  24 in total

1.  Long-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a monocentric prospective study with minimum follow-up of 5 years.

Authors:  Federico Perrone; Emanuela Bianciardi; Simona Ippoliti; Jennifer Nardella; Francesco Fabi; Paolo Gentileschi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-03-06

2.  What to do when it is technically impossible to perform laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Lionel Rebibo; Abdennaceur Dhahri; Pierre Verhaeghe; Jean-Marc Regimbeau
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Medium-Term Results of Combined Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Modified Jejuno-Ileal Bypass in Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Ahmed Hassn; Andreas Luhmann; Samir Rahmani; Gareth Morris-Stiff
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Totally robot-assisted biliary pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: single dock technique and technical outcomes.

Authors:  Ranjan Sudan; Erica Podolsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Satisfaction rate of patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy as day-case surgery compared to conventional hospitalization: a prospective non-randomized study.

Authors:  Rachid Badaoui; Lionel Rebibo; Kahina Kirat; Youssef Alami; Abdelhakim Hchikat; Cyril Cosse; Jean-Marc Regimbeau; Emmanuel Lorne
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Mechanick; Adrienne Youdim; Daniel B Jones; W Timothy Garvey; Daniel L Hurley; M Molly McMahon; Leslie J Heinberg; Robert Kushner; Ted D Adams; Scott Shikora; John B Dixon; Stacy Brethauer
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Mechanick; Adrienne Youdim; Daniel B Jones; W Timothy Garvey; Daniel L Hurley; M Molly McMahon; Leslie J Heinberg; Robert Kushner; Ted D Adams; Scott Shikora; John B Dixon; Stacy Brethauer
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.443

8.  Gastric Bypass in Older Patients: Complications, Weight Loss, and Resolution of Comorbidities at 2 Years in a Matched Controlled Study.

Authors:  Emilie Montastier; Guillaume Becouarn; Emilie Bérard; Sophie Guyonnet; Philippe Topart; Patrick Ritz
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  A meta-analysis: to compare the clinical results between gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy for the obese patients.

Authors:  Xuechao Yang; Guang Yang; Wensheng Wang; Guoqing Chen; Hua Yang
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Repeat sleeve gastrectomy compared with primary sleeve gastrectomy: a single-center, matched case study.

Authors:  Lionel Rebibo; David Fuks; Pierre Verhaeghe; Jean-Baptiste Deguines; Abdennaceur Dhahri; Jean-Marc Regimbeau
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.