BACKGROUND: We previously described the production and clinical outcomes of tissue-engineered buccal mucosa (TEBM) used to treat recurrent urethral strictures. In this study, two patients developed a recurrent stricture and there was also evidence of graft contraction. OBJECTIVE: Assess possible preclinical methods to reduce contraction of TEBM. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Using the model of TEBM in use clinically (ie, oral keratinocytes and fibroblasts cultured on de-epidermised acellular dermal scaffold), three methods of reducing TEBM contraction were investigated in vitro. INTERVENTIONS: The techniques assessed were pretreatment of de-epidermised dermis (DED) with glutaraldehyde, culture with β-aminopropionitrile (β-APN; a lysyl oxidase inhibitor), and physical restraint of TEBM grafts during culture. MEASUREMENTS: Contraction was assessed using serial digital image analysis. The cytotoxicity of the pharmacologic manipulations was assessed using monolayer cultures of oral mucosa cells. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Control TEBM lost a mean of 45.4% of its original surface area over 28 d of culture. Treating TEBM with glutaraldehyde, β-APN, or mechanical restraint during culture all significantly inhibited graft contraction. Glutaraldehyde treatment was most effective (only 5.5% loss of area with 0.1% glutaraldehyde), followed by mechanical restraint for at least 7 d (21.4% loss of area), and then β-APN (28.7% loss of area). None of the treatments had any significant effect on cell viability. This in vitro study identifies solutions for graft contracture to explore in the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Glutaraldehyde pretreatment and restraint of TEBM grafts during culture both reduce graft contraction.
BACKGROUND: We previously described the production and clinical outcomes of tissue-engineered buccal mucosa (TEBM) used to treat recurrent urethral strictures. In this study, two patients developed a recurrent stricture and there was also evidence of graft contraction. OBJECTIVE: Assess possible preclinical methods to reduce contraction of TEBM. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Using the model of TEBM in use clinically (ie, oral keratinocytes and fibroblasts cultured on de-epidermised acellular dermal scaffold), three methods of reducing TEBM contraction were investigated in vitro. INTERVENTIONS: The techniques assessed were pretreatment of de-epidermised dermis (DED) with glutaraldehyde, culture with β-aminopropionitrile (β-APN; a lysyl oxidase inhibitor), and physical restraint of TEBM grafts during culture. MEASUREMENTS: Contraction was assessed using serial digital image analysis. The cytotoxicity of the pharmacologic manipulations was assessed using monolayer cultures of oral mucosa cells. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Control TEBM lost a mean of 45.4% of its original surface area over 28 d of culture. Treating TEBM with glutaraldehyde, β-APN, or mechanical restraint during culture all significantly inhibited graft contraction. Glutaraldehyde treatment was most effective (only 5.5% loss of area with 0.1% glutaraldehyde), followed by mechanical restraint for at least 7 d (21.4% loss of area), and then β-APN (28.7% loss of area). None of the treatments had any significant effect on cell viability. This in vitro study identifies solutions for graft contracture to explore in the clinic. CONCLUSIONS:Glutaraldehyde pretreatment and restraint of TEBM grafts during culture both reduce graft contraction.