Simon C Lam1. 1. Nursing, School of Science & Technology, The Open University of Hong Kong, Ho Man Tin, Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. chlam@ouhk.edu.hk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Center for Disease Control and Prevention revised the infection control practice from Universal Precautions to Standard Precautions in 1996. Although the practice of Standard Precautions has been implemented for almost 15 years in clinical settings, recent local research still adopts the Universal Precautions Scale to measure the compliance with the current infection control practice of general frontline nursing staff and students. Despite the scale's sound psychometric properties, that its items may not be sensitive and comprehensive enough to reflect the current compliance of frontline staff to Standard Precautions is questionable. AIM: The present study aims to develop a Compliance with Standard Precautions Scale (CSPS) for use by the general frontline nurses and nursing students in clinical settings. METHODS: The current study employed a recognized instrumentation design. In addition, a preliminary assessment of reliability and validity was described. The CSPS was developed through the modification of the Universal Precautions Scale through five steps: reviewing the infection control guidelines, modifying the items of the Universal Precautions Scale, examining the relevance and adequacy of new items by an expert panel, verifying the linguistic and grammatical issues, and examining the understandability of the items and acceptability of the entire instrument by stakeholders. Internal consistency was examined using Cronbach's alpha statistic. RESULTS: The original 15-item Universal Precautions Scale was revised to the 20-item CSPS, in which 13 items were revised in wording and concept, 2 items were deleted, and 7 items were added. The 20-item new scale obtained the overall content validity index of 0.90, and 100% understandability and acceptability in face validity, and Cronbach's alpha of 0.73. CONCLUSION: With the explicit justification on each generated item and the satisfactory results of the psychometric testing, the CSPS is a preliminary reliable and valid instrument in measuring the compliance with Standard Precautions of frontline nurses and nursing students in clinical settings. 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: The Center for Disease Control and Prevention revised the infection control practice from Universal Precautions to Standard Precautions in 1996. Although the practice of Standard Precautions has been implemented for almost 15 years in clinical settings, recent local research still adopts the Universal Precautions Scale to measure the compliance with the current infection control practice of general frontline nursing staff and students. Despite the scale's sound psychometric properties, that its items may not be sensitive and comprehensive enough to reflect the current compliance of frontline staff to Standard Precautions is questionable. AIM: The present study aims to develop a Compliance with Standard Precautions Scale (CSPS) for use by the general frontline nurses and nursing students in clinical settings. METHODS: The current study employed a recognized instrumentation design. In addition, a preliminary assessment of reliability and validity was described. The CSPS was developed through the modification of the Universal Precautions Scale through five steps: reviewing the infection control guidelines, modifying the items of the Universal Precautions Scale, examining the relevance and adequacy of new items by an expert panel, verifying the linguistic and grammatical issues, and examining the understandability of the items and acceptability of the entire instrument by stakeholders. Internal consistency was examined using Cronbach's alpha statistic. RESULTS: The original 15-item Universal Precautions Scale was revised to the 20-item CSPS, in which 13 items were revised in wording and concept, 2 items were deleted, and 7 items were added. The 20-item new scale obtained the overall content validity index of 0.90, and 100% understandability and acceptability in face validity, and Cronbach's alpha of 0.73. CONCLUSION: With the explicit justification on each generated item and the satisfactory results of the psychometric testing, the CSPS is a preliminary reliable and valid instrument in measuring the compliance with Standard Precautions of frontline nurses and nursing students in clinical settings. 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Daniele Donati; Valentina Biagioli; Claudia Cianfrocca; Maria Grazia De Marinis; Daniela Tartaglini Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-01-04 Impact factor: 3.390