Literature DB >> 21802880

The inability of emergency physicians to adequately clinically estimate the underlying hemodynamic profiles of acutely ill patients.

Richard M Nowak1, Ayan Sen, Audwin J Garcia, Heidi Wilkie, James J Yang, Michael R Nowak, Michele L Moyer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Emergency physicians (EPs) estimate the underlying hemodynamics of acutely ill patients and use them to help both diagnose and formulate a treatment plan. This trial compared the EP clinically derived estimates of cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) to those measured noninvasively.
METHODS: Forty acutely ill emergency department patients with a broad range of diagnosis and blood pressure (BP) and pulse were monitored for 2 hours using novel noninvasive finger cuff technology (Nexfin; BMEYE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The Nexfin device provides continuous BP monitoring and, from the resulting pulse pressure waveform, calculates beat-to-beat CO and SVR. At baseline assessment and after 2 hours of testing and therapy, treating EPs were asked to estimate the CO and SVR (low, normal, or high), and these were compared with Nexfin measurements.
RESULTS: Twenty-five men and 15 women were enrolled with a mean age of 62.2 years (SD, 12.6 years). Eighteen had acute shortness of breath; 11, with probable stroke syndrome; 3, with suspected sepsis; and 8, with a systolic BP greater than 180 or less than 100 mm Hg. Concordance tables showed that there was very little agreement (κ values) between either the compared initial CO (-0.0873) and SVR (-0.0645) or the 2-hour values (-0.0645 and -0.1949, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Emergency physicians cannot accurately estimate the underlying hemodynamic profiles of acutely ill patients when compared with more objective measurements. This inaccuracy may have important clinical ramifications. Further study is needed to determine how to use these measured continuous CO and SVR monitoring values.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21802880     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  10 in total

1.  The effects of advanced monitoring on hemodynamic management in critically ill patients: a pre and post questionnaire study.

Authors:  Azriel Perel; Bernd Saugel; Jean-Louis Teboul; Manu L N G Malbrain; Francisco Javier Belda; Enrique Fernández-Mondéjar; Mikhail Kirov; Julia Wendon; Roger Lussmann; Marco Maggiorini
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  The diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination for estimating cardiac index in critically ill patients: the Simple Intensive Care Studies-I.

Authors:  Bart Hiemstra; Geert Koster; Renske Wiersema; Yoran M Hummel; Pim van der Harst; Harold Snieder; Ruben J Eck; Thomas Kaufmann; Thomas W L Scheeren; Anders Perner; Jørn Wetterslev; Anne Marie G A de Smet; Frederik Keus; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Jasper Truijen; Johannes J van Lieshout; Wilbert A Wesselink; Berend E Westerhof
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Clinical examination for diagnosing circulatory shock.

Authors:  Bart Hiemstra; Ruben J Eck; Frederik Keus; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.687

5.  Emergency department non-invasive cardiac output study (EDNICO): an accuracy study.

Authors:  David McGregor; Shrey Sharma; Saksham Gupta; Shanaz Ahmed; Tim Harris
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Assessing left ventricular systolic function by emergency physician using point of care echocardiography compared to expert: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bilal Albaroudi; Mahmoud Haddad; Omar Albaroudi; Manar E Abdel-Rahman; Robert Jarman; Tim Harris
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.799

7.  Noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in emergency patients with suspected heart failure, sepsis and stroke: the PREMIUM registry.

Authors:  Richard M Nowak; Prabath Nanayakkara; Salvatore DiSomma; Phillip Levy; Edmée Schrijver; Rebecca Huyghe; Alessandro Autunno; Robert L Sherwin; George Divine; Michele Moyer
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-09-23

8.  An observational study using ultrasound to assess physiological changes following fluid bolus administration in paediatric sepsis in the emergency department.

Authors:  Elliot Long; Ed Oakley; Franz E Babl; Trevor Duke
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Hemodynamic measurements for evaluating vasovagal syncope in the emergency department.

Authors:  Stewart Siu-Wa Chan; Junrong Mo; Colin Alexander Graham; Timothy Hudson Rainer
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2015-03-31

10.  Is there an association between central venous pressure measurement and ultrasound assessment of the inferior vena cava?

Authors:  J Govender; I Postma; D Wood; W Sibanda
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-07-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.