Literature DB >> 21802442

Physiological and subjective effects of acute intranasal methamphetamine during atomoxetine maintenance.

Craig R Rush1, William W Stoops, Joshua A Lile, Paul E A Glaser, Lon R Hays.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Methamphetamine abuse and dependence are significant public-health concerns. Behavioral therapies are effective for reducing methamphetamine use. However, many patients enrolled in behavioral therapies are unable to achieve significant periods of abstinence suggesting other strategies like pharmacotherapy are needed.
OBJECTIVES: This experiment determined the physiological and subjective effects of acutely administered intranasal methamphetamine during atomoxetine maintenance in seven non-treatment seeking stimulant-dependent participants. Atomoxetine was chosen for study because it blocks reuptake at the norepinephrine transporter and increases extracellular dopamine levels in the prefrontal cortex. In this way, atomoxetine might function as an agonist replacement therapy for stimulant-dependent patients.
METHODS: After at least 7 days of maintenance on atomoxetine (0 and 80 mg/day), participants were administered ascending doses of intranasal methamphetamine (0, 5, 10, 20 and 30 mg) across two experimental sessions. Intranasal methamphetamine doses were separated by 90 min.
RESULTS: Intranasal methamphetamine produced prototypical physiological and subjective effects (e.g., increased heart rate, blood pressure, temperature and subjective ratings of Good Effects). Atomoxetine maintenance augmented the heart rate-increasing effects of methamphetamine, but attenuated the pressor effects. The subjective effects of intranasal methamphetamine were similar during atomoxetine and placebo maintenance.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that methamphetamine can be safely administered to participants maintained on atomoxetine, but whether it might be an effective pharmacotherapy for methamphetamine dependence remains to be determined.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21802442      PMCID: PMC3183234          DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2011.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  45 in total

Review 1.  The pharmacology of cocaine related to its abuse.

Authors:  C E Johanson; M W Fischman
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 25.468

2.  Once-daily atomoxetine treatment for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  David Michelson; Albert J Allen; Joan Busner; Charles Casat; David Dunn; Christopher Kratochvil; Jeffrey Newcorn; F Randy Sallee; R Bart Sangal; Keith Saylor; Scott West; Douglas Kelsey; Joachim Wernicke; Nancy J Trapp; Donald Harder
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  The Michigan alcoholism screening test: the quest for a new diagnostic instrument.

Authors:  M L Selzer
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  The UKU side effect rating scale. A new comprehensive rating scale for psychotropic drugs and a cross-sectional study of side effects in neuroleptic-treated patients.

Authors:  O Lingjaerde; U G Ahlfors; P Bech; S J Dencker; K Elgen
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl       Date:  1987

5.  The drug abuse screening test.

Authors:  H A Skinner
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Atomoxetine in the treatment of children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-response study.

Authors:  D Michelson; D Faries; J Wernicke; D Kelsey; K Kendrick; F R Sallee; T Spencer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Atomoxetine increases extracellular levels of norepinephrine and dopamine in prefrontal cortex of rat: a potential mechanism for efficacy in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Frank P Bymaster; Jason S Katner; David L Nelson; Susan K Hemrick-Luecke; Penny G Threlkeld; John H Heiligenstein; S Michelle Morin; Donald R Gehlert; Kenneth W Perry
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Amphetamine-type central nervous system stimulants release norepinephrine more potently than they release dopamine and serotonin.

Authors:  R B Rothman; M H Baumann; C M Dersch; D V Romero; K C Rice; F I Carroll; J S Partilla
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 9.  Differential effects of stimulants on monoaminergic transporters: pharmacological consequences and implications for neurotoxicity.

Authors:  A E Fleckenstein; J W Gibb; G R Hanson
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2000-10-06       Impact factor: 4.432

10.  Comparison of the subjective, physiological, and psychomotor effects of atomoxetine and methylphenidate in light drug users.

Authors:  S H Heil; H W Holmes; W K Bickel; S T Higgins; G J Badger; H F Laws; D E Faries
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 4.492

View more
  6 in total

1.  Methamphetamine self-administration in humans during D-amphetamine maintenance.

Authors:  Erika Pike; William W Stoops; Lon R Hays; Paul E A Glaser; Craig R Rush
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.153

2.  Effects of the combination of wheel running and atomoxetine on cue- and cocaine-primed reinstatement in rats selected for high or low impulsivity.

Authors:  Natalie E Zlebnik; Marilyn E Carroll
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Atomoxetine for amphetamine-type stimulant dependence during buprenorphine treatment: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Richard S Schottenfeld; Marek C Chawarski; Mehmet Sofuoglu; Weng-Tink Chooi; Norzarina M Zaharim; M Azhar M Yasin; Imran Ahmad; Sharifah Zubaidiah Syed Jaapar; B Kasinather Vicknasingam
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 4.  Chronic methamphetamine self-administration disrupts cortical control of cognition.

Authors:  Aurelien Bernheim; Ronald E See; Carmela M Reichel
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Sex differences in reinstatement of cocaine-seeking with combination treatments of progesterone and atomoxetine.

Authors:  Natashia Swalve; John R Smethells; Natalie E Zlebnik; Marilyn E Carroll
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 6.  Sex Differences in Behavioral Dyscontrol: Role in Drug Addiction and Novel Treatments.

Authors:  Marilyn E Carroll; John R Smethells
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.157

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.