Literature DB >> 21802400

Frozen tissue can provide reproducible proteomic results of subcellular fractionation.

Jihyeon Lim1, Vilas Menon, Markus Bitzer, Leah M Miller, Carlos Madrid-Aliste, Louis M Weiss, Andras Fiser, Ruth H Angeletti.   

Abstract

Differential detergent fractionation (DDF) is frequently used to partition fresh cells and tissues into distinct compartments. We have tested whether DDF can reproducibly extract and fractionate cellular protein components from frozen tissues. Frozen kidneys were sequentially extracted with three different buffer systems. Analysis of the three fractions with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) identified 1693 proteins, some of which were common to all fractions and others of which were unique to specific fractions. Normalized spectral index (SI(N)) values obtained from these data were compared to evaluate both the reproducibility of the method and the efficiency of enrichment. SI(N) values between replicate fractions demonstrated a high correlation, confirming the reproducibility of the method. Correlation coefficients across the three fractions were significantly lower than those for the replicates, supporting the capability of DDF to differentially fractionate proteins into separate compartments. Subcellular annotation of the proteins identified in each fraction demonstrated a significant enrichment of cytoplasmic, cell membrane, and nuclear proteins in the three respective buffer system fractions. We conclude that DDF can be applied to frozen tissue to generate reproducible proteome coverage discriminating subcellular compartments. This demonstrates the feasibility of analyzing cellular compartment-specific proteins in archived tissue samples with the simple DDF method.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21802400      PMCID: PMC3164751          DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.06.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Biochem        ISSN: 0003-2697            Impact factor:   3.365


  18 in total

Review 1.  Translating the histone code.

Authors:  T Jenuwein; C D Allis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Global organellar proteomics.

Authors:  Steven W Taylor; Eoin Fahy; Soumitra S Ghosh
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 19.536

3.  Options and considerations when selecting a quantitative proteomics strategy.

Authors:  Bruno Domon; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Subcellular fractionation methods and strategies for proteomics.

Authors:  Yie Hou Lee; Hwee Tong Tan; Maxey C M Chung
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 5.  Proteomics.

Authors:  Carmen L de Hoog; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.929

6.  Sequential detergent fractionation of primary neurons for proteomics studies.

Authors:  Simonetta Bernocco; Costanza Fondelli; Silvia Matteoni; Letizia Magnoni; Stefano Gotta; Georg C Terstappen; Roberto Raggiaschi
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.984

7.  Differential heat shock protein localization in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Nina C Dempsey; Francesca Leoni; H Elyse Ireland; Christine Hoyle; John H H Williams
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 4.962

8.  A new method for predicting the subcellular localization of eukaryotic proteins with both single and multiple sites: Euk-mPLoc 2.0.

Authors:  Kuo-Chen Chou; Hong-Bin Shen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Assessment of ProteoExtract subcellular fractionation kit reveals limited and incomplete enrichment of nuclear subproteome from frozen liver and heart tissue.

Authors:  Christopher I Murray; Meagan Barrett; Jennifer E Van Eyk
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.984

10.  Metabolic labeling of mammalian organisms with stable isotopes for quantitative proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Christine C Wu; Michael J MacCoss; Kathryn E Howell; Dwight E Matthews; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  3 in total

1.  Buprenorphine decreases the CCL2-mediated chemotactic response of monocytes.

Authors:  Loreto Carvallo; Lillie Lopez; Fa-Yun Che; Jihyeon Lim; Eliseo A Eugenin; Dionna W Williams; Edward Nieves; Tina M Calderon; Carlos Madrid-Aliste; Andras Fiser; Louis Weiss; Ruth Hogue Angeletti; Joan W Berman
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Differential Detergent Fractionation of Membrane Protein From Small Samples of Hepatocytes and Liver Tissue for Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Drug Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters.

Authors:  Rani J Qasem; John K Fallon; Manisha Nautiyal; Merrie Mosedale; Philip C Smith
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.534

3.  Assessment of the intracellular distribution of copper in liver specimens from cats.

Authors:  Punyamanee Yamkate; Randi M Gold; David C Twedt; Jan S Suchodolski; Joerg M Steiner; Jonathan A Lidbury
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.