Literature DB >> 21802378

Women's preferences for minimally invasive incisions.

Amanda J Bush1, Stephanie N Morris, Frederick H Millham, Keith B Isaacson.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether traditional, robotic, or single-site laparoscopic incisions are more appealing to women.
DESIGN: Descriptive study using a survey (Canadian Task Force classification III).
SETTING: Single-specialty referral-based gynecology practice. PATIENTS: All patients older than 18 years who came for care to the Newton-Wellesley Hospital Minimally Invasive Gynecological Surgery Center from April 2, 2010, to June 30, 2010.
INTERVENTIONS: Three identical photos of an unscarred female abdomen were each marked with a black pen to indicate typical incision lengths and locations for robotic, single-site, and traditional laparoscopic surgery. Subjects were then asked to rank these incisions in order of preference. Additional demographic and surgical history questions were included in the survey.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two-hundred fifty of 427 patients (58.5%) returned surveys, and of these, 241 completed critical survey elements. Preference for traditional laparoscopic incisions was 56.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.1%-62.7%), for a single incision was 41.1% (95% CI, 34.8%-47.3%), and for robotic surgery was 2.5% (95% CI, 0.5%-4.5%). Two-sample test of proportion (Z test) showed the difference in preference for traditional over the other methods to be significant: p = .007 for a single incision and p <.001 for robotic surgery. Multivariatble analysis for factors influencing choice of single-site incision demonstrated that Latina/Hispanic ethnicity was the only significant factor (p = .02).
CONCLUSION: Women prefer both single-site and traditional laparoscopic incisions over robotic procedures. Inasmuch as aesthetics are an important consideration for many women and clinical outcomes are similar, during the informed-consent procedure, location and length of incisions should be included in the discussion of risks, benefits, and alternatives.
Copyright © 2011 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21802378     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  11 in total

1.  Coaxial robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy.

Authors:  Antonio R Gargiulo; Souzana Choussein; Serene S Srouji; Laura E Cedo; Pedro F Escobar
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-05-10

2.  Robot-assisted single-incision laparoscopic myomectomy: initial report and technique.

Authors:  Antonio R Gargiulo; Amelia P Bailey; Serene S Srouji
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-05-31

3.  Application of robotics in adnexal surgery.

Authors:  Olga A Tusheva; Antonio R Gargiulo; Jon I Einarsson
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013

4.  Comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy in a community hospital.

Authors:  Joseph M Gobern; C J Rosemeyer; James F Barter; Albert J Steren
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Patient Perceptions of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Gynecological Surgeries.

Authors:  Mohamad Irani; Cheruba Prabakar; Sepide Nematian; Nitasha Julka; Devika Bhatt; Pedram Bral
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Evelien M Sandberg; Claire F la Chapelle; Marjolein M van den Tweel; Jan W Schoones; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Short-Term Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Center, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Zijia Song; Kun Liu; You Li; Yiqing Shi; Yimei Jiang; Changgang Wang; Xianze Chen; Tao Zhang; Xiaopin Ji; Ren Zhao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case-control study.

Authors:  So Hyun Ahn; Joo Hyun Park; Hye Rim Kim; SiHyun Cho; Myeongjee Lee; Seok Kyo Seo; Young Sik Choi; Byung Seok Lee
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Novel port placement and 5-mm instrumentation for robotic-assisted hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ceana H Nezhat; Adi Katz; Erica C Dun; Kimberly A Kho; Friedrich A Wieser
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 10.  Three-dimensional laparoscopy: Principles and practice.

Authors:  Rakesh Y Sinha; Shweta R Raje; Gayatri A Rao
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.