| Literature DB >> 2180135 |
J Trussell1, R A Hatcher, W Cates, F H Stewart, K Kost.
Abstract
This report provides an update of the authors' previous estimates of first-year probabilities of contraceptive failure for all methods of contraception. Estimates are provided of failure during typical use (which includes both incorrect and inconsistent use) and during perfect use (correct use at every act of intercourse). The difference between these two probabilities provides a measure of how forgiving of imperfect use each method is. These revisions are prompted by recent studies that provide the first estimates of failure during perfect use for periodic abstinence and the cervical cap, by more complete evaluations of implants, and by the appearance of the Copper T 380A and disappearance of other IUDs from the US market. Also provided is a more complete explanation of how the previous estimate of the probability of becoming pregnant while relying solely on chance should be interpreted, and this estimate is revised slightly downward.Entities:
Keywords: Americas; Barrier Methods; Cervical Cap; Contraception; Contraception Continuation; Contraception Failure--statistics; Contraceptive Effectiveness; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Usage; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Family Planning; Family Planning Programs; Family Planning, Behavioral Methods; Fertility; Iud; Iud, Copper Releasing; Nonacceptors; North America; Northern America; Perfect Contraceptives; Population; Population Dynamics; Pregnancy, Unplanned; Probability; Reproductive Behavior; Research Methodology; Sexual Abstinence; Statistical Studies; Studies; Theoretical Effectiveness; United States; Vaginal Barrier Methods; Vaginal Sponge
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1990 PMID: 2180135
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stud Fam Plann ISSN: 0039-3665