Literature DB >> 21800290

Breast cancers presenting luminal B subtype features show higher discordant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 results between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Seho Park1, Hyung Seok Park, Ja Seung Koo, Woo Ick Yang, Seung Il Kim, Byeong-Woo Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to compare human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) results between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes according to their results.
METHODS: Using consecutive tissue microarrays, IHC and FISH were performed as guidelines in 950 invasive breast cancers treated between November 1999 and August 2005. Characteristics and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed using a chi-square test, the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox's model.
RESULTS: FISH-positivity was observed in 2.6%, 4.8%, 28.1%, and 93.8% of IHC 0, 1+, 2+, and 3+, respectively, and the concordance rate between the 2 assays was 95.5%. IHC-positive or FISH-positive cases were associated with poorer differentiation, negative expression of hormone receptors, and higher proliferative index. Among IHC-equivocal or IHC-negative patients, positive FISH was negatively associated with survival in univariate and multivariate analyses. Among IHC-negative patients, tumors showing luminal B subtype features such as estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, grade II/III, and high Ki-67 presented discordantly high FISH-positivity. Among IHC-positive cases, FISH was not related to outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The result of FISH is significantly related to prognosis of patients with IHC-negative or IHC-equivocal result. Therefore, FISH should be performed in IHC-equivocal cases. FISH assay might be considered for a selected group of patients with IHC-negative tumors showing luminal B subtype features of ER-positive, grade II/III, and high Ki-67 expression.
Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21800290     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  5 in total

1.  Subcellular localization of Mdm2 expression and prognosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Hyung Seok Park; Ji Min Park; Seho Park; Junghoon Cho; Seung Il Kim; Byeong-Woo Park
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Is There any Concordance between of IHC with FISH in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients?

Authors:  Mehrdad Payandeh; Masoud Sadeghi; Edris Sadeghi; Alireza Janbakhsh
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res       Date:  2017-01-01

3.  HER2 Status by Standardized Immunohistochemistry and Silver-Enhanced In Situ Hybridization in Korean Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Young Kyung Bae; Gyungyub Gong; Jun Kang; Ahwon Lee; Eun Yoon Cho; Ji Shin Lee; Kwang-Sun Suh; Dong Wha Lee; Woo Hee Jung
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.588

4.  Re-evaluation of HER2 status in 606 breast cancers-gene protein assay on tissue microarrays versus routine pathological assessment.

Authors:  Emma Sandén; Somayeh Khazaei; Helga Tryggvadottir; Signe Borgquist; Karolin Isaksson; Karin Jirström; Helena Jernström
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Assessment of the Prognostic Staging System of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition for Breast Cancer: Comparisons with the Conventional Anatomic Staging System.

Authors:  Eun Jin Kim; Hyung Seok Park; Jee Ye Kim; Seung Il Kim; Young-Up Cho; Byeong-Woo Park
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.588

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.