Literature DB >> 21800196

[Fast track approach in radical cystectomy].

A Karl1, M Seitz, M Staehler, A Becker, E Weninger, P Rittler, C Stief.   

Abstract

The origins of the fast track concept in the field of elective colon surgery can be traced back to the beginning of the 1990s. The first studies performed by Kehlet et al. sparked interest in this new form of patient management among physicians and hospital administrators. Different fast track programs for patients undergoing radical cystectomy can be found in the current literature. The goal of the prevailing fast track concepts is to reduce the perioperative burden, optimize postoperative convalescence, decrease the postoperative need for analgesics, lower the postoperative morbidity rate, and shorten hospital stays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21800196     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-011-2652-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Abdominal drainages].

Authors:  E Domínguez Fernández; S Post
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Routine nasogastric tubes are not required following cystectomy with urinary diversion: a comparative analysis of 430 patients.

Authors:  Brant A Inman; François Harel; Rabi Tiguert; Louis Lacombe; Yves Fradet
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Henrik Petrowsky; Nicolas Demartines; Valentin Rousson; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  [Fast-track concepts in the perioperative management of patients undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: review of the literature and research results].

Authors:  P J Olbert; L Baumann; A Hegele; A J Schrader; R Hofmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  [Two days' hospital stay after laparoscopic colon resection].

Authors:  L Bardram; P M Funch Jensen; P Jensen; H Kehlet
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1996-10-14

6.  Early enteral feeding versus "nil by mouth" after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials.

Authors:  S J Lewis; M Egger; P A Sylvester; S Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-06

7.  Comparison of gastric cancer surgery with versus without nasogastric decompression.

Authors:  Jun Ho Lee; Woo Jin Hyung; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Allowing normal food at will after major upper gastrointestinal surgery does not increase morbidity: a randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  Kristoffer Lassen; Jørn Kjaeve; Torunn Fetveit; Gerd Tranø; Helgi Kjartan Sigurdsson; Arild Horn; Arthur Revhaug
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Fatigue and anxiety in surgical patients.

Authors:  T Christensen; N C Hjortsø; E Mortensen; M Riis-Hansen; H Kehlet
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 6.392

Review 10.  Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Katia K F G Guenaga; Delcio Matos; Peer Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-01-21
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative and modifiable factors to lower postoperative complications after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Marie C Hupe; Mario W Kramer; Axel S Merseburger
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Bladder Cancer Recovery Pathways: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ian Maloney; Daniel C Parker; Michael S Cookson; Sanjay Patel
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2017-10-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.