Literature DB >> 21800191

[Additional personal contributions for minimally invasive surgery : How high is patient acceptance?].

E Szucsik1, M Hilder, C Lösch, M K Walz, F A Wenger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Increasing costs of the healthcare system might decrease the spectrum of insurance financed medical treatment in the future. Therefore we evaluated whether patients are prepared to pay partial costs of their own, especially for minimally invasive surgery. METHODICS: Between 1st July 2007 and 1st July 2008 patients were asked in a prospective trial preoperatively and postoperatively whether they would be prepared to pay an additional invoice of 200 EUR for a minimally invasive operation. Payment was reasoned by the hypothesis that insurance companies will reduce the DRG payment while costs are rising.
RESULTS: A total of 750 patients, men:women=279 (37.2%):471 (62.8%) undergoing elective minimally invasive operations were included in the trial. For the majority of patients (m=266:13; w=448:23) it was very important to be operated on in a center for minimally invasive surgery. Preoperatively and postoperatively the majority of patients voted for individual payment of 200 EUR to make minimally invasive surgery possible (84.4 versus 84.1%, respectively, p=0.79). Although 80.4% (411/511) of patients with national health insurance voted for payment, voting of patients with private insurance was significantly increased to 92.9% (222/239) (p<0.001). Voting for individual payment increased with a rising level of education (p=0.017), job position and income (p<0.001). Furthermore, it was significantly increased in married compared to single patients (86.5% versus 78.4%, respectively, p=0.038).
CONCLUSION: Before the operations 84.4% of patients voted for additional individual payment for minimally invasive operations but this was dependent on the socio-economic status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21800191     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-011-2089-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  11 in total

Review 1.  Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Stefano Cavalleri; Giacomo Novara; Maurizio Aragona; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomised control trials.

Authors:  Sanjay Purkayastha; Henry S Tilney; Panagiotis Georgiou; Thanos Athanasiou; Paris P Tekkis; Ara W Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  [Minimally invasive surgery and the economics of it. Can minimally invasive surgery be cost efficient from a business point of view?].

Authors:  J P Ritz; M Stufler; H J Buhr
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Feng Gao; Yun-Fei Cao; Li-Sheng Chen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Comparison of radical prostatectomy techniques: open, laparoscopic and robotic assisted.

Authors:  Rodrigo Frota; Burak Turna; Rodrigo Barros; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  [(section sign) 115 b SGB V threatens outpatient treatment for inguinal hernia. Analysis of outcome and economics].

Authors:  D Weyhe; C Winnemöller; A Hellwig; K Meurer; H Plugge; K Kasoly; H Laubenthal; K-H Bauer; W Uhl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Retrospective comparison of retroperitoneoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Bin Lang; Bin Fu; Jin-Zhi OuYang; Bao-Jun Wang; Guo-Xi Zhang; Kai Xu; Jun Zhang; Chao Wang; Tao-Ping Shi; Hui-Xia Zhou; Xin Ma; Xu Zhang
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Single access retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (SARA)--one step beyond in endocrine surgery.

Authors:  Martin K Walz; Piero F Alesina
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  [Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of the chief trials].

Authors:  F Coratti; A Coratti; R Malatesti; W Testi; F Tani
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2009 Aug-Sep

Review 10.  Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Esther Kuhry; Wolfgang Schwenk; Robin Gaupset; Ulla Romild; Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 12.111

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.