Literature DB >> 21799369

Validation of image-derived arterial input functions at the femoral artery using 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography.

Tanuj Puri1, Glen M Blake, Michelle L Frost, Amelia E B Moore, Musib Siddique, Gary J R Cook, Paul K Marsden, Ignac Fogelman, Kathleen M Curran.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of image-derived arterial input functions (IDAIF) for the dynamic quantification of bone metabolism using 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography 18F-PET is an attractive alternative to direct arterial blood sampling. PURPOSES: (a) To validate a method for obtaining the IDAIF by imaging the femoral artery against a method for deriving the IDAIF at the aorta that was previously validated against direct arterial sampling. (b) To compare the accuracy of bone plasma clearance measurements (Ki) at the total hip site obtained using the femoral artery IDAIF against Ki values at the same site obtained using the aorta IDAIF.
METHODS: Twelve healthy postmenopausal women with a mean age of 62.6 years (range, 52.3-70.6 years) had 60-min dynamic 18F-PET scans of the lumbar spine and proximal femur 2 weeks apart. The femoral artery IDAIF was obtained from the proximal femur scan using four different algorithms: (a) fixed partial volume correction (PVC) method; (b) variable PVC method; (c) Chen method; and (d) Cook-Lodge method. The aorta IDAIF was obtained from the lumbar spine scan using a previously validated method and the respective Ki values in the hip were used to assess the performance of each of the femoral artery algorithms.
RESULTS: When the femoral artery IDAIF methods were compared with the aorta IDAIF in terms of the area under the curve AUC values calculated in 4-min time intervals over 0-60 min, the absolute root mean square errors were: (a) fixed PVC, 0.52; (b) variable PVC, 0.54; (c) Chen, 0.72; and (d) Cook-Lodge, 0.49 in MBq s/ml. There were small, but statistically significant differences, in the Ki values found by all four femoral artery IDAIF methods when compared with the figures obtained using the aorta IDAIF. Bland-Altman plots of Ki values showed the best agreement for the fixed PVC method with a standard deviation of 0.0020 ml/min/ml, followed by variable PVC, Cook-Lodge and Chen method with standard deviations of 0.0022, 0.0024 and 0.0042 ml/min/ml, respectively.
CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that it is possible to measure regional bone turnover at the hip without the need to perform direct arterial sampling to acquire the arterial input function (AIF). The differences in the Ki values obtained at the hip by using aorta IDAIF and any of the four image-based AIF methods at the femoral artery were small and clinically insignificant. The performance of fixed PVC, variable PVC and Cook-Lodge method was similar although the latter was less robust than the other two methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21799369     DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328349716f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  10 in total

1.  Estimation of regional bone metabolism from whole-body 18F-fluoride PET static images.

Authors:  Musib Siddique; Glen M Blake; Michelle L Frost; Amelia E B Moore; Tanuj Puri; Paul K Marsden; Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Differences in regional bone metabolism at the spine and hip: a quantitative study using (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography.

Authors:  T Puri; M L Frost; K M Curran; M Siddique; A E B Moore; G J R Cook; P K Marsden; I Fogelman; G M Blake
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Imaging of site specific bone turnover in osteoporosis using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Glen M Blake; Musib Siddique; Michelle L Frost; Amelia E B Moore; Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 4.  Site specific measurements of bone formation using [18F] sodium fluoride PET/CT.

Authors:  Glen M Blake; Tanuj Puri; Musib Siddique; Michelle L Frost; Amelia E B Moore; Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

5.  Methodological considerations in quantification of 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine uptake measured with positron emission tomography in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Virginie Frings; Adrianus J de Langen; Maqsood Yaqub; Robert C Schuit; Astrid A M van der Veldt; Otto S Hoekstra; Egbert F Smit; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Calibrated image-derived input functions for the determination of the metabolic uptake rate of glucose with [18F]-FDG PET.

Authors:  Anders N Christensen; Michala H Reichkendler; Rasmus Larsen; Pernille Auerbach; Liselotte Højgaard; Henning B Nielsen; Thorkil Ploug; Bente Stallknecht; Søren Holm
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.690

7.  [18F]Fluoromisonidazole PET in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Tanuj Puri; Tessa A Greenhalgh; James M Wilson; Jamie Franklin; Lia Mun Wang; Victoria Strauss; Chris Cunningham; Mike Partridge; Tim Maughan
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.138

8.  Is Response Assessment of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases Better with Measurement of 18F-Fluoride Metabolic Flux Than with Measurement of 18F-Fluoride PET/CT SUV?

Authors:  Gurdip K Azad; Musib Siddique; Benjamin Taylor; Adrian Green; Jim O'Doherty; Joanna Gariani; Glen M Blake; Janine Mansi; Vicky Goh; Gary J R Cook
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  [18F] Sodium Fluoride PET Kinetic Parameters in Bone Imaging.

Authors:  Tanuj Puri; Michelle L Frost; Gary J Cook; Glen M Blake
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2021-12-01

10.  Bone Histomorphometry and 18F-Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography Imaging: Comparison Between only Bone Turnover-based and Unified TMV-based Classification of Renal Osteodystrophy.

Authors:  Louise Aaltonen; Niina Koivuviita; Marko Seppänen; Inari S Burton; Heikki Kröger; Eliisa Löyttyniemi; Kaj Metsärinne
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.333

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.