Literature DB >> 21799241

EEG potentials predict upcoming emergency brakings during simulated driving.

Stefan Haufe1, Matthias S Treder, Manfred F Gugler, Max Sagebaum, Gabriel Curio, Benjamin Blankertz.   

Abstract

Emergency braking assistance has the potential to prevent a large number of car crashes. State-of-the-art systems operate in two stages. Basic safety measures are adopted once external sensors indicate a potential upcoming crash. If further activity at the brake pedal is detected, the system automatically performs emergency braking. Here, we present the results of a driving simulator study indicating that the driver's intention to perform emergency braking can be detected based on muscle activation and cerebral activity prior to the behavioural response. Identical levels of predictive accuracy were attained using electroencephalography (EEG), which worked more quickly than electromyography (EMG), and using EMG, which worked more quickly than pedal dynamics. A simulated assistance system using EEG and EMG was found to detect emergency brakings 130 ms earlier than a system relying only on pedal responses. At 100 km h(-1) driving speed, this amounts to reducing the braking distance by 3.66 m. This result motivates a neuroergonomic approach to driving assistance. Our EEG analysis yielded a characteristic event-related potential signature that comprised components related to the sensory registration of a critical traffic situation, mental evaluation of the sensory percept and motor preparation. While all these components should occur often during normal driving, we conjecture that it is their characteristic spatio-temporal superposition in emergency braking situations that leads to the considerable prediction performance we observed.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21799241     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/5/056001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  23 in total

1.  Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses during emergency braking: an ERP study.

Authors:  Yasaman Sabahi; Seyed Kamaledin Setarehdan; Ali Motie Nasrabadi
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  The point of no return in vetoing self-initiated movements.

Authors:  Matthias Schultze-Kraft; Daniel Birman; Marco Rusconi; Carsten Allefeld; Kai Görgen; Sven Dähne; Benjamin Blankertz; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Decoding onset and direction of movements using Electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals in humans.

Authors:  Zuoguan Wang; Aysegul Gunduz; Peter Brunner; Anthony L Ritaccio; Qiang Ji; Gerwin Schalk
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2012-08-08

4.  Review of the BCI Competition IV.

Authors:  Michael Tangermann; Klaus-Robert Müller; Ad Aertsen; Niels Birbaumer; Christoph Braun; Clemens Brunner; Robert Leeb; Carsten Mehring; Kai J Miller; Gernot R Müller-Putz; Guido Nolte; Gert Pfurtscheller; Hubert Preissl; Gerwin Schalk; Alois Schlögl; Carmen Vidaurre; Stephan Waldert; Benjamin Blankertz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 5.  Traumatic brain injury detection using electrophysiological methods.

Authors:  Paul E Rapp; David O Keyser; Alfonso Albano; Rene Hernandez; Douglas B Gibson; Robert A Zambon; W David Hairston; John D Hughes; Andrew Krystal; Andrew S Nichols
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  On the applicability of brain reading for predictive human-machine interfaces in robotics.

Authors:  Elsa Andrea Kirchner; Su Kyoung Kim; Sirko Straube; Anett Seeland; Hendrik Wöhrle; Mario Michael Krell; Marc Tabie; Manfred Fahle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Noise reduction in brainwaves by using both EEG signals and frontal viewing camera images.

Authors:  Jae Won Bang; Jong-Suk Choi; Kang Ryoung Park
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  How capable is non-invasive EEG data of predicting the next movement? A mini review.

Authors:  Pouya Ahmadian; Stefano Cagnoni; Luca Ascari
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Decoding vigilance with NIRS.

Authors:  Carsten Bogler; Jan Mehnert; Jens Steinbrink; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Brain Is Faster than the Hand in Split-Second Intentions to Respond to an Impending Hazard: A Simulation of Neuroadaptive Automation to Speed Recovery to Perturbation in Flight Attitude.

Authors:  Daniel E Callan; Cengiz Terzibas; Daniel B Cassel; Masa-Aki Sato; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.