OBJECTIVE: This study tests whether or not the structural white matter lesions that are characteristic of late-life depression are associated with alterations in the functional affective circuits of late-life depression. This study used an emotional faces paradigm that has been shown to engage the affective limbic brain regions. METHOD: Thirty-three elderly depressed patients and 27 nondepressed comparison subjects participated in this study. The patients were recruited through the NIMH-sponsored Advanced Center for Interventions and Services Research for the Study of Late-Life Mood Disorders at the University of Pittsburgh Center for Bioethics and Health Law. Structural and functional MRI was used to assess white matter hyperintensity (WMH) burden and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) response on a facial expression affective-reactivity task in both elderly participants with nonpsychotic and nonbipolar major depression (unmedicated) and nondepressed elderly comparison subjects. RESULTS: As expected, greater subgenual cingulate activity was observed in the depressed patients relative to the nondepressed comparison subjects. This same region showed greater task-related activity associated with a greater burden of cerebrovascular white matter change in the depressed group. Moreover, the depressed group showed a significantly greater interaction of WMH by fMRI activity effect than the nondepressed group. CONCLUSIONS: The observation that high WMH burden in late-life depression is associated with greater BOLD response on the affective-reactivity task supports the model that white matter ischemia in elderly depressed patients disrupts brain mechanisms of affective regulation and leads to limbic hyperactivation.
OBJECTIVE: This study tests whether or not the structural white matter lesions that are characteristic of late-life depression are associated with alterations in the functional affective circuits of late-life depression. This study used an emotional faces paradigm that has been shown to engage the affective limbic brain regions. METHOD: Thirty-three elderly depressedpatients and 27 nondepressed comparison subjects participated in this study. The patients were recruited through the NIMH-sponsored Advanced Center for Interventions and Services Research for the Study of Late-Life Mood Disorders at the University of Pittsburgh Center for Bioethics and Health Law. Structural and functional MRI was used to assess white matter hyperintensity (WMH) burden and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) response on a facial expression affective-reactivity task in both elderly participants with nonpsychotic and nonbipolar major depression (unmedicated) and nondepressed elderly comparison subjects. RESULTS: As expected, greater subgenual cingulate activity was observed in the depressedpatients relative to the nondepressed comparison subjects. This same region showed greater task-related activity associated with a greater burden of cerebrovascular white matter change in the depressed group. Moreover, the depressed group showed a significantly greater interaction of WMH by fMRI activity effect than the nondepressed group. CONCLUSIONS: The observation that high WMH burden in late-life depression is associated with greater BOLD response on the affective-reactivity task supports the model that white matter ischemia in elderly depressedpatients disrupts brain mechanisms of affective regulation and leads to limbic hyperactivation.
Authors: Alessandro Tessitore; Ahmad R Hariri; Francesco Fera; William G Smith; Saumitra Das; Daniel R Weinberger; Venkata S Mattay Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2005-05-30 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Howard J Aizenstein; Meryl A Butters; Jennifer L Figurski; V Andrew Stenger; Charles F Reynolds; Cameron S Carter Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-08-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: G S Smith; C F Reynolds; B Pollock; S Derbyshire; E Nofzinger; M A Dew; P R Houck; D Milko; C C Meltzer; D J Kupfer Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Charles F Reynolds; Mary Amanda Dew; Bruce G Pollock; Benoit H Mulsant; Ellen Frank; Mark D Miller; Patricia R Houck; Sati Mazumdar; Meryl A Butters; Jacqueline A Stack; Mary Ann Schlernitzauer; Ellen M Whyte; Ariel Gildengers; Jordan Karp; Eric Lenze; Katalin Szanto; Salem Bensasi; David J Kupfer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-03-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Wenjun Li; B Douglas Ward; Chunming Xie; Jennifer L Jones; Piero G Antuono; Shi-Jiang Li; Joseph S Goveas Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Howard J Aizenstein; Alexander Khalaf; Sarah E Walker; Carmen Andreescu Journal: J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 2.680
Authors: Stephen F Smagula; Scott Beach; Andrea L Rosso; Anne B Newman; Richard Schulz Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: George S Alexopoulos; Matthew J Hoptman; Dora Kanellopoulos; Christopher F Murphy; Kelvin O Lim; Faith M Gunning Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Marnix J M van Agtmaal; Alfons J H M Houben; Frans Pouwer; Coen D A Stehouwer; Miranda T Schram Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 21.596