PURPOSE: With the increasing number of surgical procedures for osseointegrated implant placement, there has also been an increase in the number of professionals performing this procedure. Surgeons undergo different types of training, and this may influence their surgical experience. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of surgical experience on the osseointegration of dental implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using clinical charts from 2002 through 2008, during which time 265 implants were performed in 110 patients by 2 professionals who completed a postgraduate program in implant dentistry in 2002. Cases were selected for degree of difficulty, avoiding those involving areas that required bone grafts for the placement of implants, with a regular platform (3.75) and a height ranging from 10 to 13 mm. The criteria for evaluating implant osseointegration included clinical and radiographic evidence observed for a minimum period of 1 year, in accordance with the success criteria proposed by Albrektsson et al:(1)1) individual, unattached implant is immobile when tested clinically; 2) radiograph does not demonstrate evidence of peri-implant radiolucency; 3) vertical bone loss is less than 0.2 mm annually after the first year postimplantation; and 4) individual implant performance is characterized by an absence of signs and symptoms such as pain, infections, neuropathies, paresthesia, or violation of the mandibular canal. Implantation was performed in 2 stages. To relate the osseointegration rate with professional experience, cases were arranged by increasing order of placement date and were then evaluated per year and region. They were then separated into 2 groups: first 50 implants performed and implants performed after the first 50. RESULTS: The osseointegration rate of implants performed was 92.5%, with rates of 87.6% for those placed in the maxilla and 95.6% for those in the mandible. For the first 50 implants, the osseointegration rate was 84.0%, whereas in the implants performed thereafter, the rate was 94.4%. CONCLUSION: Surgical experience acquired during and after a postgraduate program in implant dentistry appears to influence osseointegration of dental implants, with a higher osseointegration rate found in implants performed by more experienced professionals.
PURPOSE: With the increasing number of surgical procedures for osseointegrated implant placement, there has also been an increase in the number of professionals performing this procedure. Surgeons undergo different types of training, and this may influence their surgical experience. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of surgical experience on the osseointegration of dental implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using clinical charts from 2002 through 2008, during which time 265 implants were performed in 110 patients by 2 professionals who completed a postgraduate program in implant dentistry in 2002. Cases were selected for degree of difficulty, avoiding those involving areas that required bone grafts for the placement of implants, with a regular platform (3.75) and a height ranging from 10 to 13 mm. The criteria for evaluating implant osseointegration included clinical and radiographic evidence observed for a minimum period of 1 year, in accordance with the success criteria proposed by Albrektsson et al:(1)1) individual, unattached implant is immobile when tested clinically; 2) radiograph does not demonstrate evidence of peri-implant radiolucency; 3) vertical bone loss is less than 0.2 mm annually after the first year postimplantation; and 4) individual implant performance is characterized by an absence of signs and symptoms such as pain, infections, neuropathies, paresthesia, or violation of the mandibular canal. Implantation was performed in 2 stages. To relate the osseointegration rate with professional experience, cases were arranged by increasing order of placement date and were then evaluated per year and region. They were then separated into 2 groups: first 50 implants performed and implants performed after the first 50. RESULTS: The osseointegration rate of implants performed was 92.5%, with rates of 87.6% for those placed in the maxilla and 95.6% for those in the mandible. For the first 50 implants, the osseointegration rate was 84.0%, whereas in the implants performed thereafter, the rate was 94.4%. CONCLUSION: Surgical experience acquired during and after a postgraduate program in implant dentistry appears to influence osseointegration of dental implants, with a higher osseointegration rate found in implants performed by more experienced professionals.