Literature DB >> 21798499

Effect of living alone on patient outcomes after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction.

Emily M Bucholz1, Saif S Rathore, Kensey Gosch, Amy Schoenfeld, Philip G Jones, Donna M Buchanan, John A Spertus, Harlan M Krumholz.   

Abstract

Considerable attention has been devoted to the effect of social support on patient outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, little is known about the relation between patient living arrangements and outcomes. Thus, we used data from PREMIER, a registry of patients hospitalized with AMI at 19 United States centers from 2003 through 2004, to assess the association of living alone with outcomes after AMI. Outcome measurements included 4-year mortality, 1-year readmission, and 1-year health status using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and the Short Form-12 Physical Health Component scales. Patients who lived alone had higher crude 4-year mortality (21.8% vs 14.5%, p <0.001) but comparable rates of 1-year readmission (41.6% vs 38.3%, p = 0.79). Living alone was associated with lower unadjusted quality of life (mean SAQ -2.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.44 to -0.35, p = 0.02) but had no impact on Short Form-12 Physical Health Component (-0.45, 95% CI -1.65 to 0.76, p = 0.47) compared to patients who did not live alone. After multivariable adjustment, patients who lived alone had a comparable risk of mortality (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.93) and readmission (hazard ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.28) as patients who lived with others. Mean quality-of-life scores remained lower in patients who lived alone (SAQ -2.91, 95% CI -5.56 to -0.26, p = 0.03). In conclusion, living alone may be associated with poorer angina-related quality of life 1 year after MI but is not associated with mortality, readmission, or other health status measurements after adjusting for other patient and treatment characteristics.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21798499      PMCID: PMC3670597          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of outcomes of patients with myocardial infarction when living alone versus those not living alone.

Authors:  J Conor O'Shea; Robert G Wilcox; Allan M Skene; Amanda L Stebbins; Christopher B Granger; Paul W Armstrong; Christoph Bode; Diego Ardissino; Hakan Emanuelsson; Philip E Aylward; Harvey D White; Zygmunt Sadowski; Eric J Topol; Robert M Califf; E Magnus Ohman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Living alone after myocardial infarction. Impact on prognosis.

Authors:  R B Case; A J Moss; N Case; M McDermott; S Eberly
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.

Authors:  J Ware; M Kosinski; S D Keller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Enhancing recovery in coronary heart disease patients (ENRICHD): study design and methods. The ENRICHD investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  The Prospective Registry Evaluating Myocardial Infarction: Events and Recovery (PREMIER)--evaluating the impact of myocardial infarction on patient outcomes.

Authors:  John A Spertus; Eric Peterson; John S Rumsfeld; Philip G Jones; Carole Decker; Harlan Krumholz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Independent importance of psychosocial factors for prognosis after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  C Welin; G Lappas; L Wilhelmsen
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Danish singles have a twofold risk of acute coronary syndrome: data from a cohort of 138 290 persons.

Authors:  K M Nielsen; O Faergeman; M L Larsen; A Foldspang
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  The impact of marital status on survival after an acute myocardial infarction: a population-based study.

Authors:  V Chandra; M Szklo; R Goldberg; J Tonascia
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Emotional support and survival after myocardial infarction. A prospective, population-based study of the elderly.

Authors:  L F Berkman; L Leo-Summers; R I Horwitz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Patient-reported outcomes as predictors of 10-year survival in women after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Tone M Norekvål; Bengt Fridlund; Berit Rokne; Leidulf Segadal; Tore Wentzel-Larsen; Jan Erik Nordrehaug
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  17 in total

1.  Predictive Model Based on Health Data Analysis for Risk of Readmission in Disease-Specific Cohorts.

Authors:  Md Shahid Ansari; Abhay Kumar Alok; Dinesh Jain; Santu Rana; Sunil Gupta; Roopa Salwan; Svetha Venkatesh
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2021-03-15

Review 2.  Psychological Aspects of Cardiac Care and Rehabilitation: Time to Wake Up to Sleep?

Authors:  Jonathan Gallagher; Giulia Parenti; Frank Doyle
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Geographic Variation in Trends and Disparities in Acute Myocardial Infarction Hospitalization and Mortality by Income Levels, 1999-2013.

Authors:  Erica S Spatz; Adam L Beckman; Yun Wang; Nihar R Desai; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 14.676

4.  Relation of patients living without a partner or spouse to being physically active after acute coronary syndromes (from the PULSE accelerometry substudy).

Authors:  Philip Green; Jonathan D Newman; Jonathan A Shaffer; Karina W Davidson; Mathew S Maurer; Joseph E Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 5.  Interventions that improve health-related quality of life in patients with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kyoungrim Kang; Leila Gholizadeh; Sally C Inglis; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  One is the deadliest number: the detrimental effects of social isolation on cerebrovascular diseases and cognition.

Authors:  Brett Friedler; Joshua Crapser; Louise McCullough
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 17.088

7.  Usefulness of Social Support in Older Adults After Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction (from the SILVER-AMI Study).

Authors:  Yaakov S Green; Alexandra M Hajduk; Xuemei Song; Harlan M Krumholz; Samir K Sinha; Sarwat I Chaudhry
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Quality of life impacts on 16-year survival of an older ethnically diverse cohort.

Authors:  Barry Gurland; Jeanne A Teresi; Joseph P Eimicke; Mathew S Maurer; M Carrington Reid
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.485

9.  Long-term prognostic significance of living alone and other risk factors in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  I Vujcic; H Vlajinac; E Dubljanin; Z Vasiljevic; D Matanovic; J Maksimovic; S Sipetic; J Marinkovic
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Health-Related Quality of Life Among Myocardial Infarction Survivors: Structural Equation Modeling Approach.

Authors:  Helen Lamesgin Endalew; Bikis Liyew; Tilahun Kassew; Gebrekidan Ewnetu Tarekegn; Ambaye Dejen Tilahun; Tesfa Sewunet Alamneh
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.