Literature DB >> 21798494

Prognostic utility of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

David Planer1, Roxana Mehran, Bernhard Witzenbichler, Giulio Guagliumi, Jan Z Peruga, Bruce R Brodie, Dariusz Dudek, Martin Möckel, Selene Leon Reyes, Gregg W Stone.   

Abstract

Measurement of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is readily obtainable in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the prognostic utility of LVEDP during primary PCI has never been studied. LVEDP was measured in 2,797 patients during primary PCI in the Harmonizing Outcomes with RevascularIZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial. Outcomes were assessed at 30 days and 2 years stratified by medians of LVEDP. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine whether LVEDP was an independent determinate of adverse outcomes. The median (interquartile range) for LVEDP was 18 mm Hg (12 to 24). For patients with LVEDP >18 mm Hg versus those with ≤18 mm Hg, hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for death and death or reinfarction at 30 days were 2.00 (1.20 to 3.33, p = 0.007) and 1.84 (1.24 to 2.73, p = 0.002), respectively, and at 2 years were 1.57 (1.12 to 2.21, p = 0.009) and 1.45 (1.14 to 1.85, p = 0.002), respectively. Patients in the highest quartile of LVEDP (≥24 mm Hg) were at the greatest risk of mortality. Only a weak correlation was present between LVEDP and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; R(2) = 0.03, p <0.01). By multivariable analysis increased LVEDP was an independent predictor of death or reinfarction at 2 years (hazard ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.42, p = 0.03) even after adjustment for baseline LVEF. In conclusion, baseline increased LVEDP is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI even after adjustment for baseline LVEF. Patients with LVEDP ≥24 mm Hg are at the greatest risk for early and late mortality.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21798494     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  12 in total

1.  Combined assessment of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and ejection fraction by left ventriculography predicts long-term outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Daiga Saito; Rine Nakanishi; Ippei Watanabe; Takayuki Yabe; Ryo Okubo; Hideo Amano; Mikihito Toda; Takanori Ikeda
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Abnormal P-wave terminal force in lead V1 is associated with cardiac death or hospitalization for heart failure in prior myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Akira Tamura; Kumie Torigoe; Yoshiyuki Kawano; Kazuhiro Shinozaki; Munenori Kotoku; Junichi Kadota
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Support Pressure Acting on the Epicardial Surface of a Rat Left Ventricle-A Computational Study.

Authors:  Denisa Martonová; David Holz; Dorothea Brackenhammer; Michael Weyand; Sigrid Leyendecker; Muhannad Alkassar
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-06

4.  Prognostic Value of LVEDP in Acute Myocardial Infarction: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Stephen C Brienesse; Allan J Davies; Arshad Khan; Andrew J Boyle
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Left Ventricular Pressure Ratio Predicts In-Hospital Outcomes in Hospitalized Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Sameh W Almousa; Mark N Belkin; Tess Allan; Allison Stephens; Joseph Kern; Miryea Cisneros; Janet Friant; Cynthia Arevalo; Sandeep Nathan; Atman P Shah; Jonathan Paul; Rohan Kalathiya; Jonathan Grinstein; John E A Blair
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.022

6.  Natural history and prognostic implications of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an analysis of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) II randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Arshad A Khan; Mohammed S Al-Omary; Nicholas J Collins; John Attia; Andrew J Boyle
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 7.  Heart failure after myocardial infarction in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Mechanisms, incidence and identification of patients at risk.

Authors:  Thomas J Cahill; Rajesh K Kharbanda
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-26

8.  Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Akihiro Kobayashi; Naoki Misumida; John T Fox; Yumiko Kanei
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2015-10-25

9.  Aortic Pulsatility Index: A Novel Hemodynamic Variable for Evaluation of Decompensated Heart Failure.

Authors:  Mark N Belkin; Sara Kalantari; Anthony J Kanelidis; Tamari Miller; Bryan A Smith; Stephanie A Besser; David Tehrani; Ben B Chung; Ann Nguyen; Nitasha Sarswat; John E A Blair; Daniel Burkhoff; Gabriel Sayer; Sean P Pinney; Nir Uriel; Gene Kim; Jonathan Grinstein
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 6.592

10.  Usefulness of a Novel Risk Score to Predict In-Hospital Mortality in Patients ≥ 60 Years of Age with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Lorena Millo; Alexander McKenzie; Andrew De la Paz; Cynthia Zhou; Michael Yeung; George A Stouffer
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.