Literature DB >> 21795973

Clinical characterization of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer depending on the KRAS status.

Dominik P Modest1, Sebastian Stintzing, Ruediger P Laubender, Jens Neumann, Andreas Jung, Clemens Giessen, Michael Haas, Philipp Aubele, Christoph Schulz, Stefan Boeck, Hans-Joachim Stemmler, Thomas Kirchner, Volker Heinemann.   

Abstract

This retrospective study investigated the clinical characteristics of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) depending on the KRAS status, thereby differentiating KRAS exon 2 mutations in codon 12 versus codon 13. In total, 273 patients with mCRC receiving first-line therapy were analyzed. One hundred patients were treated within the FIRE-3 trial (FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab), 147 patients within the AIO KRK-0104 trial (cetuximab plus CAPIRI or CAPOX), and further 26 patients received therapy outside the study. Thirty-eight tumors with KRAS mutation in codon 13, 140 tumors with mutation in codon 12, and 95 tumors with KRAS wild type as a comparison were included in this analysis. Bivariate analyses demonstrated significant differences between KRAS wild-type, codon 12-mutated, and codon 13-mutated tumors with regard to synchronous lymph node metastasis (P=0.018), organ metastasis (76.8% vs. 65.9% vs. 89.5%, P=0.009), liver metastasis (89.5% vs. 78.2% vs. 92.1%, P=0.025), lung metastasis (29.5% vs. 42.9% vs. 50%, P=0.041), liver-only metastasis (48.4% vs. 28.8% vs. 28.9%, P=0.006), and metastases in two or more organs (49.5, 61.4, 71.1, P=0.047). Regression models indicated a significant impact of KRAS mutations in codon 12 versus codon 13 for synchronous organ and nodal metastasis (P=0.01, 0.03). This pooled analysis indicates that mCRC is a heterogeneous disease, which seems to be defined by KRAS mutations of the tumor. Compared with KRAS codon 12 mutations, codon 13-mutated mCRC presents as a more aggressive disease frequently associated with local and distant metastases at first diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21795973     DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3283493160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  22 in total

Review 1.  Molecular markers predictive of chemotherapy response in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Stacey Shiovitz; William M Grady
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-02

Review 2.  Antibodies directed against receptor tyrosine kinases: current and future strategies to fight cancer.

Authors:  Bénédicte Fauvel; Aziz Yasri
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 3.  [Molecular pathology of colorectal cancer].

Authors:  J H L Neumann; A Jung; T Kirchner
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  A specific KRAS codon 13 mutation is an independent predictor for colorectal cancer metachronous distant metastases.

Authors:  Qingyang Feng; Li Liang; Li Ren; Jingwen Chen; Ye Wei; Wenju Chang; Dexiang Zhu; Qi Lin; Peng Zheng; Jianmin Xu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Prognosis and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer patients with KRAS gene mutation: a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Dongyang Yang; Xiaorong Lai; Fei Xu; Ying Li; Weiwei Jiang; Dong Ma
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2019-02-01

6.  Non-invasive sensitive detection of KRAS and BRAF mutation in circulating tumor cells of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Nur-Afidah Mohamed Suhaimi; Yu Miin Foong; Daniel Yoke San Lee; Wai Min Phyo; Igor Cima; Esther Xing Wei Lee; Wei Lin Goh; Wei-Yen Lim; Kee Seng Chia; Say Li Kong; Min Gong; Bing Lim; Axel M Hillmer; Poh Koon Koh; Jackie Y Ying; Min-Han Tan
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 6.603

7.  Is availability of anti-EGFR therapy for the colorectal adenocarcinomas showing fascin expression limited?

Authors:  Nazım Emrah Koçer; Fazilet Kayaselçuk
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.493

8.  KRAS mutations by digital PCR in circulating tumor cells isolated from the mesenteric vein are associated with residual disease and overall survival in resected colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Yan Li; Mariano Monzo; Isabel Moreno; Francisco Martinez-Rodenas; Raquel Hernandez; Joan J Castellano; Jordi Canals; Bing Han; Carmen Muñoz; Alfons Navarro
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Different metastatic pattern according to the KRAS mutational status and site-specific discordance of KRAS status in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mi-Jung Kim; Hye Seung Lee; Jee Hyun Kim; Yu Jung Kim; Ji Hyun Kwon; Jeong-Ok Lee; Soo-Mee Bang; Kyoung Un Park; Duck-Woo Kim; Sung-Bum Kang; Jae-Sung Kim; Jong Seok Lee; Keun-Wook Lee
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Computational analysis of KRAS mutations: implications for different effects on the KRAS p.G12D and p.G13D mutations.

Authors:  Chih-Chieh Chen; Tze-Kiong Er; Yen-Yi Liu; Jenn-Kang Hwang; Maria Jesus Barrio; Maximiliano Rodrigo; Enrique Garcia-Toro; Marta Herreros-Villanueva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.