Literature DB >> 21795885

Closing the "care in the air" capability gap for severe lung injury: the Landstuhl Acute Lung Rescue Team and extracorporeal lung support.

Raymond Fang1, Patrick F Allan, Shannon G Womble, Morris T Porter, Johana Sierra-Nunez, Richard S Russ, Gina R Dorlac, Clayne Benson, John S Oh, Sandra M Wanek, Erik C Osborn, Stephen V Silvey, Warren C Dorlac.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The success of US Air Force Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATT) in transporting critically ill and injured patients enabled changes in military medical force deployment and casualty care practice. Even so, a subset of casualties remains who exceed even CCATT capabilities for movement. These patients led to the creation of the Landstuhl Acute Lung Rescue Team (ALeRT) to close the "care in the air" capability gap.
METHODS: The ALeRT Registry was queried for the period between November 1, 2005, and June 30, 2010. Additionally, Landstuhl Regional Medical Center critical care patient transfers to host nation medical centers were reviewed for cases using extracorporeal lung support systems.
RESULTS: For the review period, US Central Command activated the ALeRT on 40 occasions. The ALeRT successfully evacuated patients on 24 of 27 missions launched (89%). Three patients were too unstable for ALeRT evacuation. Of the 13 remaining activations, four patients died and nine patients improved sufficiently for standard CCATT movement. The ALeRT initiated pumpless extracorporeal lung assistance six times, but only once to facilitate evacuation. Two patients were supported with full extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support after evacuation due to progressive respiratory failure.
CONCLUSIONS: ALeRT successfully transported 24 casualties from the combat zones to Germany. Without the ALeRT, these patients would have remained in the combat theater as significant consumers of limited deployed medical resources. Pumpless extracorporeal lung assistance is already within the ALeRT armamentarium, but has only been used for one aeromedical evacuation. Modern extracorporeal membrane oxygenation systems hold promise as a feasible capability for aeromedical evacuation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21795885     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182218f97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  5 in total

Review 1.  Combat Trauma-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Joseph C Broderick; Fabiola Mancha; Brit J Long; Joseph K Maddry; Kevin K Chung; Steven G Schauer
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-09-14

2.  When place and time matter: How to conduct safe inter-hospital transfer of patients.

Authors:  Divya Sethi; Shalini Subramanian
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-01

Review 3.  Veno-venous ECMO: a synopsis of nine key potential challenges, considerations, and controversies.

Authors:  David B Tulman; Stanislaw P A Stawicki; Bryan A Whitson; Saarik C Gupta; Ravi S Tripathi; Michael S Firstenberg; Don Hayes; Xuzhong Xu; Thomas J Papadimos
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Development and Evaluation of An Abbreviated Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Course for Nonsurgical Physicians and Nurses.

Authors:  Joseph K Maddry; R Madelaine Paredes; Joni A Paciocco; Maria Castaneda; Allyson A Araña; Crystal A Perez; Lauren K Reeves; Ryan K Newberry; Vikhyat S Bebarta; Nurani Kester; Phillip E Mason
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-04-16

Review 5.  Inter-hospital and intra-hospital patient transfer: Recent concepts.

Authors:  Ashish Kulshrestha; Jasveer Singh
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.