BACKGROUND: Elevated plasma level of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) was reported to be associated with endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerotic risk factors. We assessed the prognostic value of plasma ADMA levels in 997 consecutive individuals referred for coronary angiography from July 2006 to June 2009. METHODS: ADMA was measured by high performance liquid chromatography. All subjects were followed for a median period of 2.4years for the occurrence of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, defined as cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke), and MACE plus clinically-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR). RESULTS: Plasma ADMA levels were significantly higher in patients with significant coronary artery disease (CAD) (≥50% stenosis, n=655) than those with insignificant CAD (20-50% stenosis, n=272) and normal coronary artery (<20% stenosis, n=70) (0.47±0.10μmol/l vs 0.44±0.10μmol/l vs 0.42±0.08μmol/l, p <0.001). By multivariate analysis, plasma ADMA level was identified as a significant independent risk factor of significant CAD (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.10-1.50; p=0.002). Moreover, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that, comparing with the ADMA tertile I, the highest ADMA tertile was a significant independent predictor for all adverse long-term clinical outcomes. Notably, plasma ADMA level remained associated with the long-term outcomes in non-diabetic individuals, but not in those with diabetes (interaction p=0.04 for MACE plus TVR). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that elevated plasma ADMA level might be a risk factor of significant CAD, and might predict worse long-term clinical outcomes in subjects referred for cardiac catheterization, especially in non-diabetic individuals.
BACKGROUND: Elevated plasma level of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) was reported to be associated with endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerotic risk factors. We assessed the prognostic value of plasma ADMA levels in 997 consecutive individuals referred for coronary angiography from July 2006 to June 2009. METHODS:ADMA was measured by high performance liquid chromatography. All subjects were followed for a median period of 2.4years for the occurrence of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, defined as cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke), and MACE plus clinically-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR). RESULTS: Plasma ADMA levels were significantly higher in patients with significant coronary artery disease (CAD) (≥50% stenosis, n=655) than those with insignificant CAD (20-50% stenosis, n=272) and normal coronary artery (<20% stenosis, n=70) (0.47±0.10μmol/l vs 0.44±0.10μmol/l vs 0.42±0.08μmol/l, p <0.001). By multivariate analysis, plasma ADMA level was identified as a significant independent risk factor of significant CAD (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.10-1.50; p=0.002). Moreover, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that, comparing with the ADMA tertile I, the highest ADMA tertile was a significant independent predictor for all adverse long-term clinical outcomes. Notably, plasma ADMA level remained associated with the long-term outcomes in non-diabetic individuals, but not in those with diabetes (interaction p=0.04 for MACE plus TVR). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that elevated plasma ADMA level might be a risk factor of significant CAD, and might predict worse long-term clinical outcomes in subjects referred for cardiac catheterization, especially in non-diabetic individuals.
Authors: Murat Yuksel; Abdulkadir Yildiz; Mustafa Oylumlu; Fatih Mehmet Turkcu; Mehmet Zihni Bilik; Aysun Ekinci; Bilal Elbey; Ebru Tekbas; Sait Alan Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2015-03-07 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Yohannes T Ghebremariam; John P Cooke; Fouzia Khan; Rahul N Thakker; Peter Chang; Nigam H Shah; Kevin T Nead; Nicholas J Leeper Journal: Vasc Med Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 3.239
Authors: Yohannes T Ghebremariam; Paea LePendu; Jerry C Lee; Daniel A Erlanson; Anna Slaviero; Nigam H Shah; James Leiper; John P Cooke Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rushi V Parikh; Rebecca Scherzer; Carl Grunfeld; Elaine M Nitta; Anna Leone; Jeffrey N Martin; Steven G Deeks; Peter Ganz; Priscilla Y Hsue Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2013-04-30 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Maria Daniela Defagó; Dongfeng Gu; James E Hixson; Lawrence C Shimmin; Treva K Rice; Charles C Gu; Cashell E Jaquish; De-Pei Liu; Jiang He; Tanika N Kelly Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 2.689