OBJECTIVE: To investigate the usefulness of pamidronate in the management of active Charcot's arthropathy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Open prospective study with a follow-up of 12 months, including patients with active neuroarthropathy seen over a period of 3 years in our rheumatology unit. Patients received three pamidronate infusions at 0, 2, and 4 months. Clinical assessment, serum and urine bone turnover markers, radiological exam, and scintigraphy were performed before and after treatment. RESULTS: Seven patients were ncluded (4F/3M), mean age, 51.3 years (30-64). The underlying disease was diabetes mellitus in 4 cases, syringomyelia in 2, and sensory and autonomic neuropathy in 1. The joints affected were shoulder, ankle, tarsians, metacarpophalaneal, and metatarsophalangeal. All patients showed a rapid resolution of clinical symptoms, with a clear reduction of all bone remodeling markers that achieved statistical significance for urine NTX and urinary pyridoline (P=.04 and P=.03, respectively). Six of 7 patients disclosed at the end of follow-up a radiological healing. Quantitative scyntigraphy showed a clear reduction of the bone (99)Tm uptake. No important side affects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Pamidronate appears as a useful treatment for neuroarthropathy independently of the underlying disease. A rapid diagnosis and early pamidronate treatment could avoid severe articular consequences.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the usefulness of pamidronate in the management of active Charcot's arthropathy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Open prospective study with a follow-up of 12 months, including patients with active neuroarthropathy seen over a period of 3 years in our rheumatology unit. Patients received three pamidronate infusions at 0, 2, and 4 months. Clinical assessment, serum and urine bone turnover markers, radiological exam, and scintigraphy were performed before and after treatment. RESULTS: Seven patients were ncluded (4F/3M), mean age, 51.3 years (30-64). The underlying disease was diabetes mellitus in 4 cases, syringomyelia in 2, and sensory and autonomic neuropathy in 1. The joints affected were shoulder, ankle, tarsians, metacarpophalaneal, and metatarsophalangeal. All patients showed a rapid resolution of clinical symptoms, with a clear reduction of all bone remodeling markers that achieved statistical significance for urine NTX and urinary pyridoline (P=.04 and P=.03, respectively). Six of 7 patients disclosed at the end of follow-up a radiological healing. Quantitative scyntigraphy showed a clear reduction of the bone (99)Tm uptake. No important side affects were reported. CONCLUSIONS:Pamidronate appears as a useful treatment for neuroarthropathy independently of the underlying disease. A rapid diagnosis and early pamidronate treatment could avoid severe articular consequences.