Literature DB >> 21794074

ISTH/SSC lupus anticoagulant testing guidelines: how far have these been adopted by laboratories?

I Jennings, S Kitchen, D P Kitchen, T A L Woods, I D Walker.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21794074     DOI： 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04448.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN： 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory diagnosis of the lupus anticoagulant.

Authors:  Thomas L Ortel
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Presence of antiphospholipid antibody is a risk factor in thrombotic events in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome or relevant diseases.

Authors:  Koji Habe; Hideo Wada; Takeshi Matsumoto; Kohshi Ohishi; Makoto Ikejiri; Kimiko Matsubara; Tatsuhiko Morioka; Yuki Kamimoto; Tomoaki Ikeda; Naoyuki Katayama; Tsutomu Nobori; Hitoshi Mizutani
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  How to Achieve Standardization? Diluted Russell Viper Venom Test for Lupus Anticoagulant Detection in a Chinese Female Population.

Authors:  Feng Lu; Qingkai Dai; Yuefang Wang; Xia Zhang; Ge Zhang
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

4.  Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test-specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant.

Authors:  Osamu Kumano; Gary W Moore
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2019-07-30

5.  Application of different lupus anticoagulant diagnostic algorithms to the same assay data leads to interpretive discrepancies in some samples.

Authors:  Gary W Moore; James C Maloney; Naomi de Jager; Clare L Dunsmore; Dervilla K Gorman; Richard F Polgrean; Maria L Bertolaccini
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2017-06-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.