Literature DB >> 21793068

Direct sampling and analysis from solid-phase extraction cards using an automated liquid extraction surface analysis nanoelectrospray mass spectrometry system.

Matthew J Walworth1, Mariam S ElNaggar, Joseph J Stankovich, Chuck Witkowski, Jeremy L Norris, Gary J Van Berkel.   

Abstract

Direct liquid extraction based surface sampling, a technique previously demonstrated with continuous flow and autonomous pipette liquid microjunction surface sampling probes, has recently been implemented as a liquid extraction surface analysis (LESA) mode on a commercially available chip-based infusion nanoelectrospray ionization (nanoESI) system. In the present paper, the LESA mode was applied to the analysis of 96-well format custom-made solid-phase extraction (SPE) cards, with each well consisting of either a 1 or a 2 mm diameter monolithic hydrophobic stationary phase. These substrate wells were conditioned, loaded with either single or multi-component aqueous mixtures, and read out using the commercial nanoESI system coupled to a hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer or a linear ion trap mass spectrometer. The extraction conditions, including extraction/nanoESI solvent composition, volume, and dwell times, were optimized in the analysis of targeted compounds. Limit of detection and quantitation as well as analysis reproducibility figures of merit were measured. Calibration data was obtained for propranolol using a deuterated internal standard which demonstrated linearity and reproducibility. A 10× increase in signal and cleanup of micromolar angiotensin II from a concentrated salt solution was demonstrated. In addition, a multicomponent herbicide mixture at ppb concentration levels was analyzed using MS(3) spectra for compound identification in the presence of isobaric interferences. Published in 2011 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21793068     DOI: 10.1002/rcm.5132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 0951-4198            Impact factor:   2.419


  6 in total

1.  Direct analysis of sialylated or sulfated glycosphingolipids and other polar and neutral lipids using TLC-MS interfaces.

Authors:  Hyejung Park; Ying Zhou; Catherine E Costello
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.922

2.  qNMR for profiling the production of fungal secondary metabolites.

Authors:  Wilson C Brooks; Noemi D Paguigan; Huzefa A Raja; Franklin J Moy; Nadja B Cech; Cedric J Pearce; Nicholas H Oberlies
Journal:  Magn Reson Chem       Date:  2017-02-05       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Real-time metabolomics on living microorganisms using ambient electrospray ionization flow-probe.

Authors:  Cheng-Chih Hsu; Mariam S ElNaggar; Yao Peng; Jinshu Fang; Laura M Sanchez; Samantha J Mascuch; Kirsten A Møller; Emad K Alazzeh; Jiri Pikula; Robert A Quinn; Yi Zeng; Benjamin E Wolfe; Rachel J Dutton; Lena Gerwick; Lixin Zhang; Xueting Liu; Maria Månsson; Pieter C Dorrestein
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Native Liquid Extraction Surface Analysis Mass Spectrometry: Analysis of Noncovalent Protein Complexes Directly from Dried Substrates.

Authors:  Nicholas J Martin; Rian L Griffiths; Rebecca L Edwards; Helen J Cooper
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Spatially-Resolved Top-down Proteomics Bridged to MALDI MS Imaging Reveals the Molecular Physiome of Brain Regions.

Authors:  Vivian Delcourt; Julien Franck; Jusal Quanico; Jean-Pascal Gimeno; Maxence Wisztorski; Antonella Raffo-Romero; Firas Kobeissy; Xavier Roucou; Michel Salzet; Isabelle Fournier
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  Electro-focusing liquid extractive surface analysis (EF-LESA) coupled to mass spectrometry.

Authors:  A Gareth Brenton; A Ruth Godfrey
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 6.986

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.