BACKGROUND: Refractory germ cell tumor (GCT) patients have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The identification of novel active agents may be impaired by use of response as the primary endpoint in phase 2 trials. Improved endpoints could enhance the development of new effective agents. METHODS: The characteristics and outcome of refractory GCT patients enrolled in 7 single-agent phase 2 trials conducted at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1990 to 2008 were reviewed. The study agents were suramin, all-transretinoic acid, topotecan, pyrazoloacridine, temozolomide, ixabepilone, and sunitinib. The major endpoints evaluated were response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Ninety patients (87 male, 3 female) were treated. The primary tumor site was testis in 65 patients, mediastinum in 17 patients, retroperitoneum in 4 patients, and other in 4 patients. Eighty-six patients had nonseminoma, and 4 patients had pure seminoma. Best responses were 1 (1%) partial response (ixabepilone), 15 (17%) stable disease, and 74 (82%) progressive disease. Median PFS and OS were 1.0 month (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-1.3) and 4.7 months (95% CI, 3.5-6.4), respectively. Eighty-six of the 90 patients have died. The 12- and 16-week PFS rates were 9% (95% CI, 3-15%) and 6% (95% CI, 1%-11%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with refractory GCT progressed rapidly to these single agents. PFS and OS may be useful endpoints for designing phase 2 trials testing novel agents in this population. Twelve-week PFS (with comparison to the 9% benchmark rate reported herein) is the recommended endpoint for phase 2 trial design and median OS (using 4.7 months as the predicted median for the control arm) is suggested for phase 3 trials.
BACKGROUND: Refractory germ cell tumor (GCT) patients have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The identification of novel active agents may be impaired by use of response as the primary endpoint in phase 2 trials. Improved endpoints could enhance the development of new effective agents. METHODS: The characteristics and outcome of refractory GCT patients enrolled in 7 single-agent phase 2 trials conducted at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1990 to 2008 were reviewed. The study agents were suramin, all-transretinoic acid, topotecan, pyrazoloacridine, temozolomide, ixabepilone, and sunitinib. The major endpoints evaluated were response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Ninety patients (87 male, 3 female) were treated. The primary tumor site was testis in 65 patients, mediastinum in 17 patients, retroperitoneum in 4 patients, and other in 4 patients. Eighty-six patients had nonseminoma, and 4 patients had pure seminoma. Best responses were 1 (1%) partial response (ixabepilone), 15 (17%) stable disease, and 74 (82%) progressive disease. Median PFS and OS were 1.0 month (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-1.3) and 4.7 months (95% CI, 3.5-6.4), respectively. Eighty-six of the 90 patients have died. The 12- and 16-week PFS rates were 9% (95% CI, 3-15%) and 6% (95% CI, 1%-11%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with refractory GCT progressed rapidly to these single agents. PFS and OS may be useful endpoints for designing phase 2 trials testing novel agents in this population. Twelve-week PFS (with comparison to the 9% benchmark rate reported herein) is the recommended endpoint for phase 2 trial design and median OS (using 4.7 months as the predicted median for the control arm) is suggested for phase 3 trials.
Authors: M Mego; D Svetlovska; M Chovanec; M Rečkova; K Rejlekova; J Obertova; P Palacka; Z Sycova-Mila; U De Giorgi; J Mardiak Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Darren R Feldman; Lawrence H Einhorn; David I Quinn; Yohann Loriot; Johnathan K Joffe; David J Vaughn; Aude Fléchon; Julio Hajdenberg; Abdel-Baset Halim; Hamim Zahir; Robert J Motzer Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2013-02-17 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: M Mego; D Svetlovska; K Kalavska; P Lesko; M Makovník; J Obertova; Z Orszaghova; P Palacka; M Rečková; K Rejlekova; Sycova-Mila Z; J Mardiak; M Chovanec Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 3.651
Authors: Babak B Navi; Samuel Singer; Alexander E Merkler; Natalie T Cheng; Jacqueline B Stone; Hooman Kamel; Costantino Iadecola; Mitchell S V Elkind; Lisa M DeAngelis Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Z Cierna; M Mego; V Miskovska; K Machalekova; M Chovanec; D Svetlovska; K Hainova; K Rejlekova; D Macak; S Spanik; D Ondrus; K Kajo; J Mardiak; P Babal Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: M Mego; D Svetlovska; M Reckova; K Kalavska; J Obertova; P Palacka; K Rejlekova; Z Sycova-Mila; M Chovanec; J Mardiak Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2021-05-29 Impact factor: 3.850