Literature DB >> 2179286

Comparison of CNS-related subjective symptoms in hypertensive patients treated with either a new controlled release (CR/ZOK) formulation of metoprolol or atenolol.

E Dimenäs1, J Ostergren, K Lindvall, C Dahlöf, G Westergren, U de Faire.   

Abstract

The present study evaluated and compared subjective symptoms in hypertensive patients (N = 83) at therapeutically comparable dosages of a new controlled release (CR/ZOK) formulation of metoprolol (100 mg od) and atenolol (50 mg od). The trial was a 4-week randomized double-blind study preceded by a placebo run-in period. Blood pressure (BP) was recorded 24 hours after intake of last dose. In subpopulations, 24-hour ambulatory BP was recorded and exercise tests performed. Subjective symptoms were evaluated with a previously documented questionnaire (MSE-profile) which has been shown to be sensitive in detecting CNS-related symptoms caused by beta blockers. The MSE-profile includes three dimensions: Contentment, Vitality and Sleep. The results showed that there were no significant differences between the groups in BP reduction either at 24 hours or over the entire 24-hour dose interval. Furthermore, the degree of beta 1-blockade (reduction in exercise-induced tachycardia) 24 hours after last dose did not differ between the groups. There were no significant differences regarding subjective symptoms (Contentment, Vitality, Sleep) between the two treatment groups. An a posteriori power analysis showed that the power to detect a true difference was of an acceptable magnitude. In conclusion, there was no difference in CNS-related symptoms between metoprolol and atenolol at therapeutically comparable dosages indicating that the degree of lipophilicity may be of minor importance for the occurrence of such symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2179286     DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1990.tb03502.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  6 in total

Review 1.  Atenolol. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  A N Wadworth; D Murdoch; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Quality of life is not negatively affected by diet and exercise intervention in healthy men with cardiovascular risk factors.

Authors:  M L Hellénius; C Dahlöf; H Aberg; I Krakau; U de Faire
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Lipophilic versus hydrophilic beta(1) blockers and the cardiac sympatho-vagal balance during stress and daily activity in patients after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A Kardos; V Long; J Bryant; J Singh; P Sleight; B Casadei
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  CNS-related performance and haemodynamics of metoprolol-Oros and propranolol after single and 3 days dosing in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A L van Steveninck; M S Pieters; H C Schoemaker; D D Breimer; A F Cohen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  A double-blind comparison of once-daily metoprolol controlled-release and atenolol in the treatment of Chinese patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  M F Chen; C Y Yang; W J Chen; C M Lee; C C Wu; C S Liau; Y T Lee
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 6.  Controlled release metoprolol formulations. A review of their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension and ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  G L Plosker; S P Clissold
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.