OBJECTIVE: Osteoarthritis (OA) clinical practice guidelines identify a substantial therapeutic role for physical activity, but objective information about the physical activity of this population is lacking. The aim of this study was to objectively measure levels of physical activity in adults with knee OA and report the prevalence of meeting public health physical activity guidelines. METHODS: Cross-sectional accelerometry data from 1,111 adults with radiographic knee OA (49-84 years old) participating in the Osteoarthritis Initiative accelerometry monitoring ancillary study were assessed for meeting the aerobic component of the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (≥150 minutes/week moderate-to-vigorous-intensity activity lasting ≥10 minutes). Quantile regression was used to test median sex differences in physical activity levels. RESULTS: Aerobic physical activity guidelines were met by 12.9% of men and 7.7% of women with knee OA. A substantial proportion of men and women (40.1% and 56.5%, respectively) were inactive, having done no moderate-to-vigorous activity that lasted 10 minutes or more during the 7 days. Although men engaged in significantly more moderate-to-vigorous activity (average daily minutes 20.7 versus 12.3), they also spent more time in no or very-low-intensity activity than women (average daily minutes 608.2 versus 585.8). CONCLUSION: Despite substantial health benefits from physical activity, adults with knee OA were particularly inactive based on objective accelerometry monitoring. The proportions of men and women who met public health physical activity guidelines were substantially less than those previously reported based on self-reported activity in arthritis populations. These findings support intensified public health efforts to increase physical activity levels among people with knee OA.
OBJECTIVE:Osteoarthritis (OA) clinical practice guidelines identify a substantial therapeutic role for physical activity, but objective information about the physical activity of this population is lacking. The aim of this study was to objectively measure levels of physical activity in adults with knee OA and report the prevalence of meeting public health physical activity guidelines. METHODS: Cross-sectional accelerometry data from 1,111 adults with radiographic knee OA (49-84 years old) participating in the Osteoarthritis Initiative accelerometry monitoring ancillary study were assessed for meeting the aerobic component of the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (≥150 minutes/week moderate-to-vigorous-intensity activity lasting ≥10 minutes). Quantile regression was used to test median sex differences in physical activity levels. RESULTS: Aerobic physical activity guidelines were met by 12.9% of men and 7.7% of women with knee OA. A substantial proportion of men and women (40.1% and 56.5%, respectively) were inactive, having done no moderate-to-vigorous activity that lasted 10 minutes or more during the 7 days. Although men engaged in significantly more moderate-to-vigorous activity (average daily minutes 20.7 versus 12.3), they also spent more time in no or very-low-intensity activity than women (average daily minutes 608.2 versus 585.8). CONCLUSION: Despite substantial health benefits from physical activity, adults with knee OA were particularly inactive based on objective accelerometry monitoring. The proportions of men and women who met public health physical activity guidelines were substantially less than those previously reported based on self-reported activity in arthritis populations. These findings support intensified public health efforts to increase physical activity levels among people with knee OA.
Authors: Søren Brage; Niels Wedderkopp; Paul W Franks; Lars Bo Andersen; Karsten Froberg Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Samannaaz S Khoja; Gustavo J Almeida; Mary Chester Wasko; Lauren Terhorst; Sara R Piva Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Elena Losina; Jamie E Collins; Bhushan R Deshpande; Savannah R Smith; Griffin L Michl; Ilana M Usiskin; Kristina M Klara; Amelia R Winter; Heidi Y Yang; Faith Selzer; Jeffrey N Katz Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Christine A Pellegrini; Sara M Powell; Nicholas Mook; Katherine DeVivo; Linda Ehrlich-Jones Journal: Curr Rheumatol Rep Date: 2018-10-06 Impact factor: 4.592
Authors: Jeffrey B Driban; Grace H Lo; Charles B Eaton; Lori Lyn Price; Bing Lu; Timothy E McAlindon Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Prakash Jayabalan; Masha Kocherginsky; Alison H Chang; Gerald W Rouleau; Kimberly L Koloms; Jungwha Lee; Dorothy Dunlop; Rowland W Chang; Leena Sharma Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Jing Song; Lee A Lindquist; Rowland W Chang; Pamela A Semanik; Linda S Ehrlich-Jones; Jungwha Lee; Min-Woong Sohn; Dorothy D Dunlop Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Daniel K White; Catrine Tudor-Locke; David T Felson; K Doug Gross; Jingbo Niu; Michael Nevitt; Cora E Lewis; James Torner; Tuhina Neogi Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 3.966