PURPOSE: To investigate the radiation exposure in non-vascular fluoroscopy guided interventions and to search strategies for dose reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dose area product (DAP) of 638 consecutive non-vascular interventional procedures of one year were analyzed with respect to different types of interventions; gastrointestinal tract, biliary interventions, embolizations of tumors and hemorrhage. Data was analyzed with special focus on the fluoroscopy doses and frame doses. The third quartiles (Q3) of fluoroscopy dose values were defined in order to set a reference value for our in-hospital practice. RESULTS: Mean fluoroscopy times of gastrostomy, jejunostomy, right and left sided percutaneous biliary drainage, chemoembolization of the liver and embolization due to various hemorrhages were 5.9, 8.6, 13.5, 16.6, 17.4 and 25.2 min, respectively. The respective Q3 total DAP were 52.9, 73.3, 155.1, 308.4, 428.6 and 529.3 Gy*cm2. Overall, around 66% of the total DAP originated from the radiographic frames with only 34% of the total DAP applied by fluoroscopy (P<0.001). The investigators experience had no significant impact on the total DAP applied, most likely since there was no stratification to intervention-complexity. CONCLUSION: To establish Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs), there is a need to establish a registry of radiation dose data for the most commonly performed procedures. Documentation of interventional procedures by fluoroscopy "grabbing" has the potential to considerably reduce radiation dose applied and should be used instead of radiographic frames whenever possible.
PURPOSE: To investigate the radiation exposure in non-vascular fluoroscopy guided interventions and to search strategies for dose reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dose area product (DAP) of 638 consecutive non-vascular interventional procedures of one year were analyzed with respect to different types of interventions; gastrointestinal tract, biliary interventions, embolizations of tumors and hemorrhage. Data was analyzed with special focus on the fluoroscopy doses and frame doses. The third quartiles (Q3) of fluoroscopy dose values were defined in order to set a reference value for our in-hospital practice. RESULTS: Mean fluoroscopy times of gastrostomy, jejunostomy, right and left sided percutaneous biliary drainage, chemoembolization of the liver and embolization due to various hemorrhages were 5.9, 8.6, 13.5, 16.6, 17.4 and 25.2 min, respectively. The respective Q3 total DAP were 52.9, 73.3, 155.1, 308.4, 428.6 and 529.3 Gy*cm2. Overall, around 66% of the total DAP originated from the radiographic frames with only 34% of the total DAP applied by fluoroscopy (P<0.001). The investigators experience had no significant impact on the total DAP applied, most likely since there was no stratification to intervention-complexity. CONCLUSION: To establish Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs), there is a need to establish a registry of radiation dose data for the most commonly performed procedures. Documentation of interventional procedures by fluoroscopy "grabbing" has the potential to considerably reduce radiation dose applied and should be used instead of radiographic frames whenever possible.
Authors: Francesco Giurazza; Fabio Corvino; Andrea Contegiacomo; Paolo Marra; Nicola Maria Lucarelli; Marco Calandri; Mattia Silvestre; Antonio Corvino; Pierleone Lucatelli; Francesco De Cobelli; Raffaella Niola; Maurizio Cariati Journal: J Ultrasound Date: 2019-07-31
Authors: Daniel Schmitz; Thomas Vogl; Nour-Eldin Abdelrehim Nour-Eldin; Boris Radeleff; Jens-Christian Kröger; Andreas H Mahnken; Harald Ittrich; Hans-Björn Gehl; Bernd Plessow; Joachim Böttcher; Josef Tacke; Markus Wispler; Ulrich Rosien; Wolfgang Schorr; Markus Joerdens; Nicolas Glaser; Erik-Sebastian Fuchs; Andrea Tal; Bettina Friesenhahn-Ochs; Thomas Leimbach; Lars Höpner; Marko Weber; Stefan Gölder; Michael Böhmig; Svetlana Hetjens; Jochen Rudi; Alexander Schegerer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: R Ruiz-Cruces; E Vano; F Carrera-Magariño; F Moreno-Rodriguez; M M Soler-Cantos; M Canis-Lopez; J Hernández-Armas; F J Diaz-Romero; F Rosales-Espizua; J M Fernandez-Soto; R Sanchez-Casanueva; A Martin-Palanca; M Perez-Martinez; A Gil-Agudo; M A Zarca-Diaz; V Parra-Osorio; J J Muñoz Ruiz-Canela; T Moreno-Sanchez; A Lopez-Medina; C Moreno-Saiz; P Galan-Montenegro; J J Gallego-Beuter; M Gonzalez-de-Garay; J C Zapata-Jimenez; J M Pastor-Vega; S Cañete Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Maurice Pradella; Christoph Trumm; Bram Stieltjes; Daniel T Boll; Christoph J Zech; Rolf W Huegli Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-05-16 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Pratik A Shukla; Marcin K Kolber; Richard Tapnio; Adam Zybulewski; Abhishek Kumar; Rajesh I Patel Journal: Gastroenterology Res Date: 2019-06-07